GB/T 42374-2023Specifications for classification and evaluation of snow sports competition (English PDF)

Foreword

This document is in accordance with the provisions of GB/T 1.1-2020 "Guidelines for Standardization Work Part 1: Structure and Drafting Rules for Standardization Documents" drafting.

Introduction

The successful holding of the 2022 Beijing Winter Olympics is a milestone for the development of my country's winter sports. "Being mindful of the overall situation, confident and open, welcoming The Beijing Winter Olympics spirit of overcoming difficulties, pursuing excellence, and creating the future together has greatly stimulated the sports enthusiasm of hundreds of millions of people and greatly promoted the sports events in our country.

The development of the industry has injected a strong spiritual force into accelerating the construction of a sports power. By 2022, the number of people participating in ice and snow sports in my country will reach 3.46.

The thriving mass ice and snow sports have become the main force on the journey to a healthy China, ushering in a new era of ice and snow sports development.

The success of the Beijing Winter Olympics has set off an upsurge of ice and snow sports across the country. Mass skiing events have been held successively in various places, It has attracted many ice and snow enthusiasts, and the participants are developing toward diversification. Mass skiing events have become a driving force for the vigorous development of sports competitions. growth point. However, affected by the lack of standards and specifications, there are still uneven competition levels, irregular competition organization, and incomplete venue equipment.

It is urgent to formulate a unified and standardized classification and classification of mass skiing events. Evaluation documents to guide the development of mass skiing events.

This document formulates the rules with strong operability and good versatility, which is conducive to promoting the organization of skiing events, forming a high-contribution and influential The large event brand demonstration effect provides reference for ski lovers to choose excellent ski events, increases the penetration rate of skiing population, and further promotes Promote the healthy and sustainable development of my country's ski sports industry. Standards for Classification and Evaluation of Popular Skiing Events

1 Scope

This document establishes the grading rules for mass skiing events, and specifies the general requirements, assessment subjects, application conditions, and grading.

The requirements, application of results and management requirements describe the assessment method.

This document is applicable to the grading and evaluation activities organized by mass skiing events.

2 Normative references

The contents of the following documents constitute the essential provisions of this document through normative references in the text. Among them, dated references For documents, only the version corresponding to the date is applicable to this document; for undated reference documents, the latest version (including all amendments) is applicable to this document.

GB/T 10001.1 Graphic symbols for public information - Part 1: General symbols

GB 19079.6 Opening Conditions and Technical Requirements for Sports Places Part 6: Ski Resorts

GB/T 40232 Safety signs for ice and snow sports venues

GB/T 42378 Basic terminology for popular skiing sports

3 Terms and Definitions

The following terms and definitions defined in GB/T 42378 apply to this document.

4 Levels

According to the four major indicators of the professionalism of the skiing competition, the attention of the media and the public, the contribution and the innovation, the mass skiing competition Things are divided into 6 levels, from high to low are 1st, 2nd, 3rd, 4th, 5th, 6th.

5 General requirements

5.1 The evaluation index system should be objective and reasonable, fully considering the development of existing and future technical levels.

5.2 The evaluation method should be scientific and standardized, and operable.

5.3 Evaluation activities should be fair, impartial, open and credible.

5.4 The evaluation results should be consistent with the purpose and content of the evaluation activities.