Valid

GB/T 41619-2022Guidelines of science and technology research project evaluation—Basic research projects (English PDF)

科学技术研究项目评价实施指南 基础研究项目

Preview PDF

This is a limited preview

Buy now to download the full PDF (20 pages)

Need quotation for your management?

Get a formal quotation for GB/T 41619-2022 in 30 minutes.

Issued by

SAMR; SAC

Level / Type

National · Recommended

Issue date

October 12, 2022

Implementation date

October 12, 2022

Scope

GB/T 41619-2022 is the English-translated version of 科学技术研究项目评价实施指南 基础研究项目.

GB/T 41619-2022 gives guidance for evaluating basic research projects in the natural sciences and technology.

It sets the evaluation principles, adding innovativeness, representativeness and differentiation to those of GB/T 22900-2022, and then the four evaluation types: project appraisal, mid-term evaluation, acceptance evaluation and follow-up evaluation, each with its own content.

It describes the evaluation methods and takes the evaluation procedure through twelve steps, from clarifying the purpose and the basis of the evaluation to choosing the experts, collecting and analysing information and using the results.

Four informative annexes add an index system, the peer review method, a multidimensional index method and a worked example. It is meant for project management bodies, host institutions and evaluation bodies, takes its terms from GB/T 22900-2022, was issued on 12 October 2022 and has applied since that day.

Found what you need?

Document preview — GB/T 41619-2022

National Standard of the People's Republic of China

ICS
03.100.40
Classification
A 01

Issued by: State Administration for Market Regulation; Standardization Administration of the PRC

Contents

  • Preface
  • Introduction
  • 1 Scope
  • 2 Normative references
  • 3 Terms and Definitions
  • 4 Evaluation Principle
  • 5 Evaluation Type
  • 5.1 General
  • 5.2 Project Appraisal
  • 5.3 Mid-term evaluation
  • 5.4 Acceptance evaluation
  • 5.5 Follow-up evaluation
  • 6 Evaluation content
  • 6.1 General
  • 6.2 Project Appraisal
  • 6.3 Mid-term evaluation
  • 6.4 Acceptance evaluation
  • 6.5 Follow-up evaluation
  • 7 Evaluation method
  • 8 Evaluation Procedures
  • 8.1 General
  • 8.2 Clarify the purpose of evaluation
  • 8.3 Determine the basis for evaluation
  • 8.4 Determine the evaluation subject
  • 8.5 Determining the evaluation content
  • 8.6 Choosing an Evaluation Method
  • 8.7 Determine the evaluation method
  • 8.8 Selection of evaluation experts
  • 8.9 Collecting Evaluation Information
  • 8.10 Analyzing and evaluating information
  • 8.11 Determining evaluation results
  • 8.12 Using Evaluation Results
  • Appendix A (Informative) Basic Research Project Evaluation Index System
  • Appendix B (Informative) Peer Review Method
  • Appendix C (Informative) Multidimensional Index Evaluation Method
  • Appendix D (Informative) Basic Research Project Evaluation Example
  • Reference

Foreword

This document is in accordance with the provisions of GB/T 1.1-2020 "Guidelines for Standardization Work Part 1: Structure and Drafting Rules of Standardization Documents" drafted.

Introduction

0.1 General

The improvement of national scientific and technological competitiveness is increasingly dependent on breakthroughs in basic research, and basic research projects are It is one of the important ways for science and technology to become self-reliant and support the continuous improvement of national science and technology competitiveness. How to scientifically and effectively evaluate basic research projects, support The importance of maintaining project management and improving the effect of project implementation has become increasingly prominent.

This document provides basic guidelines for basic research project evaluation activities, and provides guidelines for organizations that carry out basic research project evaluation activities. normative guidance. This document is a recommended national standard. The evaluation type, evaluation content and evaluation method are based on the characteristics and management of the project to be evaluated.

Selective use is required. The adoption of this document will help to improve the evaluation system of basic research projects, improve the comprehensive management level of basic research projects, Optimize the allocation of basic research resources, improve the effectiveness of basic research projects, and carry out scientific and standardized evaluation activities for basic research projects in my country.

The overall improvement of the implementation effect of basic research projects has laid a good foundation.

0.2 Classification of basic research projects

The "Decision on Improving the Evaluation of Science and Technology" (Guo Ke Fa Ji Zi [2003] No. 142) distinguishes basic research categories and is divided into free Exploring basic research and strategic basic research; State Council "Several Opinions on Comprehensively Strengthening Basic Scientific Research" (Guo Fa [2018] No. 4)

Basic research is clearly divided into free exploration and goal-oriented research, and goal-oriented basic research retains the connotation of strategic basic research;

The State Council's "Notice on Several Measures for Optimizing Scientific Research Management and Improving Scientific Research Performance" (Guo Fa [2018] No. 25) clarifies that "basic research and application "Research" projects are three types of evaluation projects (basic research and applied basic research projects, technology and product development projects, application demonstration projects Items), and pointed out the key points of the evaluation of such projects, emphasizing the evaluation of "the major originality and scientific value of new discoveries, new principles, new methods, and new laws. value, the effectiveness of addressing key scientific issues in the major needs of economic and social development and national security, the effect of supporting technology and product development, representation The quality and level of scientific research results such as scientific papers are mainly based on international and domestic peer review." From the connotation, the "basic research and Applied Basic Research" correspond to free-exploration and goal-oriented basic research respectively; "Strengthening "From 0 to 1" Basic Research Work Plan" (Guo Ke Fa Ji [2020] No. 46), basic research projects are divided into basic research projects and applied basic research projects.

The State Council's "Notice on Several Measures to Optimize Scientific Research Management and Improve Scientific Research Performance" (Guo Fa [2018] No. 25) is basically consistent.

In summary, according to the actual situation of scientific research projects in my country, after thorough discussions by experts, this document divides basic research projects into two categories.

Free exploratory basic research projects and goal-oriented basic research projects, and goal-oriented basic research projects include applied goal-oriented and Scientific goal-oriented basic research projects. Free exploration basic research projects focus on evaluating new discoveries, new principles, new methods, and new laws.

Originality and scientific value, focus on evaluating the level of representative achievements; target-oriented basic research projects focus on evaluating solutions to economic and social development and Efficacy and applied value of key scientific issues in major national security needs. It has the characteristics of "0-1" originality, non-consensus and interdisciplinary type.

The basic research projects listed are all free-exploration or goal-oriented basic research projects.

1 Scope

This document provides suggestions for evaluating basic research projects in the field of natural science and technology, including evaluation principles, evaluation types, evaluation content, Evaluation methods and evaluation procedures.

This document applies to scientific research project management agencies, undertaking units, evaluation agencies and other relevant parties to carry out scientific research project evaluation activities.

The evaluation activities of scientific research projects with basic research attributes in other fields other than the fields of natural science and technology are used for reference.

2 Normative references

The contents of the following documents constitute essential provisions of this document through normative references in the text. Among them, dated citations documents, only the version corresponding to that date applies to this document; for undated references, the latest edition (including all amendments) applies to this document.

GB/T 22900-2022 General Principles for Evaluation of Science and Technology Research Projects

3 Terms and Definitions

Terms and definitions defined in GB/T 22900-2022 apply to this document.

4 Evaluation principles

The evaluation should meet the evaluation principles proposed in GB/T 22900-2022, and consider basic research projects in the fields of natural science and technology. (hereinafter referred to as "basic research projects") characteristics, the following principles should also be followed.

---Innovative, the evaluation activities should fully consider the research content, method or innovation degree of the project;

---Representative, evaluation activities should focus on the examination of representative results in accordance with the needs of scientific value and social impact improvement;

---Differences, evaluation activities should be based on project characteristics and rules, establish evaluation priorities, and flexibly select evaluation methods. free exploration Basic research projects mainly evaluate the innovation and academic contribution of project research, suitable for long-term evaluation and international peer evaluation; goals Oriented basic research projects mainly evaluate the effectiveness of solving basic scientific problems in economic and social development and national security, focusing on program evaluation.

5 Evaluation Types

5.1 General

Basic research project evaluation can include four categories. project evaluation, mid-term evaluation, acceptance evaluation and follow-up evaluation. According to project management needs, Select the appropriate evaluation type according to the characteristics of the project to be evaluated.

The evaluation of general basic research projects (such as those with a small investment in scientific research funds) should focus on the evaluation of project initiation and acceptance, and may not be underway.

Periodic evaluation, and annual progress report and filing system shall be implemented; the evaluation of major basic research projects (such as those with large investment in scientific research funds) should include

......
This preview omits tables, figures, formulas and parts of the technical clauses. The complete document — 20 pages — is available in the English PDF.

Referenced standards

Similar standards

How to Download GB/T 41619-2022

  1. 1

    Add to cart

    Click "Download PDF" on this page and choose "Buy this standard". You can add more standards before checkout.

  2. 2

    Checkout

    Enter your email and billing details. Payment is processed securely by Stripe (cards or bank transfer). Prefer bank details? Request a quotation (min. order $300).

  3. 3

    Instant delivery (0–9 sec)

    Delivery is automatic: within seconds of payment you'll receive an email with a secure download link. The link stays valid for 72 hours.

  4. 4

    Invoice included

    A tax invoice is attached to the confirmation email. Need a custom invoice? Contact us.

Related Standards

English PDF
20 pages
Instant delivery (0–9 sec)
Invoice included
View Cart

Secure payment via Stripe

Payments accepted

VisaMastercardAmerican ExpressApple PayGoogle PayStripe

GB/T 41619-2022

$360.00