GB/T 45997-2025Guidelines for five-dimensions value evaluation of science and technology achievement (English PDF)

Foreword

This document is in accordance with the provisions of GB/T 1.1-2020 "Guidelines for standardization work Part 1: Structure and drafting rules for standardization documents" Drafting.

Please note that some of the contents of this document may involve patents. The issuing organization of this document does not assume the responsibility for identifying patents.

This document is proposed by the Ministry of Science and Technology of the People's Republic of China.

This document is under the jurisdiction of the National Technical Committee for Science and Technology Evaluation Standardization (SAC/TC580).

This document was drafted by: Science and Technology Evaluation Center of the Ministry of Science and Technology, China Science and Technology Evaluation and Achievement Management Research Association, Qingdao Agricultural University, China Science Institute of Documentation and Information, China-Zimbabwe Science and Technology Evaluation Research Center, Guangdong Productivity Promotion Center, Guangdong Technology and Economic Research and Development Center, Shanghai Science and Technology Consulting Co., Ltd., Suzhou Guanghua Science and Technology Promotion Center, China Rongtong Science Research Institute Group Co., Ltd., China International Science and Technology Promotion Jinhui, Zhongkehechuang (Beijing) Science and Technology Achievement Evaluation Center, Beijing August Melon Technology Co., Ltd., Foshan Science and Technology Finance Association, Guangzhou Science and Technology Project Evaluation Center, Guoneng Economic and Technological Research Institute Co., Ltd., Sichuan (Chengdu) Academician Consulting Service Center of the Chinese Academy of Sciences and the Chinese Academy of Engineering (Chengdu Science and Technology Evaluation Center) Evaluation Center), Greater Bay Area Science and Technology Innovation Service Center (Guangzhou) Co., Ltd., Institute of Medical Information, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou Productivity Promotion Center Co., Ltd., Zhejiang Science and Technology Evaluation and Achievement Transformation Center, China Certification and Accreditation Association, Beijing Highway Society, Xiaomi Communication Technology Co., Ltd., Taiyuan Technology Transfer Promotion Center, Hangzhou Greennew Information Technology Co., Ltd., Shanghai Technology Exchange Co., Ltd., China Power Construction Group Shandong Electric Power Construction First Engineering Co., Ltd., Zhejiang University Science and Technology Park Development Co., Ltd., Beijing Huachuang Zhidao Intellectual Property Consulting Service Co., Ltd.

Co., Ltd., China National Institute of Metrology, China Southern Power Grid Research Institute Co., Ltd., SDIC Xinjiang Lop Nur Potash Co., Ltd., China Communications Association Transportation Research Institute (Beijing) Co., Ltd., Hubei Technology Exchange, Shanghai New Energy Science and Technology Achievement Transformation and Industry Promotion Center Center, Baotou Rare Earth Research Institute, China Shipbuilding Industry Corporation Comprehensive Technical and Economic Research Institute, China Three Gorges Corporation, Chongqing Municipal Government Institute of Science and Technology, Qingdao High-tech Industry Promotion Center (Qingdao Technology Market Service Center), Beijing Tianyi Medical University Affiliated Hospital Tan Hospital, China Electronic Product Reliability and Environmental Testing Institute (Fifth Electronics Research Institute of the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology), Geographical Sciences Institute of the Chinese Academy of Sciences Institute of Science and Resources, Beijing Medical and Health Promotion Center, Nanjing Normal University, China Technology Exchange Co., Ltd., Harbin Steam Turbine Works Limited Liability Company.

The main drafters of this document are: Qu Mingjian, Zan Tingting, Xiao Kefeng, Zeng Yan, Li Minrong, Zhou Yuying, Liao Suliang, Zhang Xuying, Yuan Qi, Gao Jing, Zhang Yongsheng, Yan Changchun, Li Changqing, Xing Hongzhu, Zhong Jiaxin, Yao Yun, Tao Rui, Wu Sihong, Chen Ji, Qin Haiou, Gao Dongping, Su Xiongbin, Wan Xiaoli, Fu Binyou, Lü Jia, Qu Heng, Li Guozhong, Chen Jie, Yan Mingfeng, Zhang Jianping, Chu Ruhui, Wang Yong, Sui Zhiwei, Wu Baoying, Li Dongxing, Du Xiaochuan, Sheng Jianxin, Huang Zan, Cao Hongzhang, Wen Zhenning, Xiang Xin, Wang Yanxia, Yu Jingjing, Xu Beibei, Li Simin, Liu Yongjun, Mo Bing, Wang Guanghui, Xie Wei, Li Wei, Wei Xiaoyao, Yu Yue, Li Ling, Su Fu, Li Nan, Tang Jinhua, Su Baoying, Yang Yuan, Zhou Jiarong, Li Changyou, Yu Haiyang, and Shi Changhui.

Introduction

In May 2021, the 19th meeting of the Central Committee for Comprehensively Deepening Reforms reviewed and approved the "Notice on Improving the Evaluation Mechanism for Scientific and Technological Achievements".

Guiding Opinions”, requiring “to accelerate the realization of self-reliance and self-improvement in science and technology, to make good use of the baton of scientific and technological achievement evaluation, to follow the laws of scientific and technological innovation, to adhere to the correct In July 2021, the General Office of the State Council issued the "Notice on Improving the Evaluation Mechanism of Scientific and Technological Achievements" The Guiding Opinions on the System of Scientific and Technological Achievements (Guobanfa [2021] No. 26) once again clearly proposed to “comprehensively and accurately evaluate the scientific, technological, economic, and social In November 2021, the Ministry of Science and Technology jointly launched a pilot reform of scientific and technological achievement evaluation with ten departments, one of which was The task is to establish a five-element value evaluation mechanism for scientific and technological achievements, solve the problem of "what to evaluate" in scientific and technological achievements evaluation, and hope to form a system of five-element value evaluation mechanism for scientific and technological achievements through standardization.

The five-element value evaluation method of scientific and technological achievements is operable and replicable, providing support for the reform of scientific and technological achievement evaluation.

The policy requirements for the reform of scientific and technological achievement evaluation have been clarified, the connotation of the five-element value evaluation of scientific and technological achievements has been clarified, and the evaluation content and methods have been determined.

The five-element value assessment provides a basic guideline.

Guidelines for the Five-element Value Assessment of Scientific and Technological Achievements

1 Scope

This document establishes the principles of five-element value assessment of scientific and technological achievements, provides the classification and assessment focus of scientific and technological achievements, and It provides guidance on the content of scientific, technological, economic, social and cultural value assessment, and describes the assessment methods, assessment process and result form.

This document is applicable to all types of scientific and technological achievement evaluations and can be used as a reference for other types of scientific and technological evaluations.

2 Normative references

GB/T 40148

GB/T 44731-2024

3 Terms and Definitions

The terms and definitions defined in GB/T 40148 and the following apply to this document.