GB/T 45403-2025Digital supply chain — Maturity model (English PDF)

Foreword

This document is in accordance with the provisions of GB/T 1.1-2020 "Guidelines for standardization work Part 1: Structure and drafting rules for standardization documents" Drafting is required.

Please note that some of the contents of this document may involve patents. The issuing organization of this document does not assume the responsibility for identifying patents.

This document was proposed by the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology of the People's Republic of China.

This document is under the jurisdiction of the National Technical Committee for Standardization of Information and Industrialization Integration Management (SAC/TC 573).

This document was drafted by: National Industrial Information Security Development Research Center, China Academy of Information and Communications Technology, China Telecommunication Technology Certification Center Co., Ltd.

Co., Ltd., Beijing Saisheng Technology Co., Ltd., Guangzhou CESI Certification Center Service Co., Ltd., Building Materials Industry Information Center, China Light Industry Enterprise Industry Management Association, China National Textile and Apparel Council, China Quality Certification Center, Shanghai Quality Management Science Research Institute, Shandong Information Technology Industry Association Industry Development Research Institute, Beijing Junyou Integrity Testing and Certification Co., Ltd., Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd., Midea Group Co., Ltd., ZTE Communications Co., Ltd., Kaos Digital Technology (Shanghai) Co., Ltd., UFIDA Network Technology Co., Ltd., Tsinghua University, Inner Mongolia University of Science and Technology, Kunlun Digital Intelligence Technology Co., Ltd., Beijing Dipu Technology Co., Ltd., State Energy Group Materials Co., Ltd., Guangdong Electric Power Guangzhou Power Supply Bureau, Industrial Cloud Manufacturing (Sichuan) Innovation Center Co., Ltd., Kweichow Moutai Co., Ltd., Dong'e Ejiao Co., Ltd., Infinitus (China) Co., Ltd., Xinjiang Huiding Logistics Co., Ltd., China Railway Materials Group Co., Ltd., Pangu Yunlian (Tianjin) Digital Technology Co., Ltd., Wuhan Huagong Saibai Data System Co., Ltd., Huagong Technology Industry Co., Ltd., National China Power Grid Co., Ltd., China Southern Power Grid Co., Ltd., China Electricity Council Technology Service Center Co., Ltd., State Grid Corporation of China Co., Ltd., State Grid Shaanxi Electric Power Co., Ltd., Dongguan Aolei Mobile Lighting Equipment Co., Ltd., Dalian Shengguang Technology Development Co., Ltd.

Shenzhen Mingxin Digital Technology Co., Ltd., Shenzhen Quxin Digital Technology Co., Ltd., Shenzhen Digital Guangdong Network Construction Co., Ltd., Shenzhen Chengtong Digital Technology Co., Ltd., Shenzhen Mingxin Digital Technology Co., Ltd., Shenzhen Quxin Digital Technology Co., Ltd., Shenzhen Ming...

Yin Technology Co., Ltd., Tianjin Bohai Chemical Development Co., Ltd., Dongfang Electric Group Dongfang Turbine Co., Ltd., Zhengzhou Qiying Information Technology Co., Ltd., Henan Xuji Instrument Co., Ltd., Qijiayoudao Network Technology Beijing Co., Ltd., Perfect (Guangdong) Daily Necessities Co., Ltd., Shenzhen Xieke Internet Technology Co., Ltd., Shanghai Zhuoxinrui Supply Chain Management Co., Ltd., China National Nuclear Corporation, AECC Shenyang Engine Research Institute, Guangdong Midea Kitchen Appliance Manufacturing Co., Ltd., Anhui Gujing Gongjiu Co., Ltd., Luzhou Laojiao Co., Ltd.

Company, Fujian Jinsubao Technology Co., Ltd., Hangzhou Guanyuan Data Co., Ltd., ENN Group Co., Ltd., Guoneng Railway Equipment Co., Ltd.

Liability Company, Beijing Zhongding Haoshuo Technology Co., Ltd.

The main drafters of this document are: Dou Keqin, Li Jun, Ling Dabing, Liu Jie, Liu Xiaoyin, Song Yuguang, Xu Shunyi, Wang Hongyuan, Wang Jinde, Liu Mingjun, Song Xiaobo, Wang Wenbo, Cheng Weihua, Jiang Yuan, Guo Hesheng, Tian Jie, Wang Zhilin, Chen Wei, Yang Baogang, Li Ping, Zheng Yan, Li Qing, Liu Junhua, Lu Chenli, Jiao Zhujin, Fu Pengxia, Zhao Jiehui, Wang Lian, Guo Xiaolin, Lu Youfei, Chen Zhuozhuo, Su Dong, Liu Yongliang, Wang Li, Liu Huafeng, Duan Haixia, Liu Yaojun, Chen Yaochun, Wang Hui, Yi Gang, Yang Xiao, Xia Yong, Xu Peifeng, Ge Qu, Han Wende, Liu Xin, Wang Peng, Chen Zhangjun, Chen Liangliang, Yang Xue, Tan Junfeng, Wang Bo, Jin Xiaoqiang, Lin Hongzheng, Wang Xiaonan, Zeng Weixiang, Guo Jinpeng, Li Yufeng, Li Yan, Wang Jianjun, Liu Botao, Gao Linxian, Chang Xinglong, Qiu Chenghai, Zhang Jianfeng, Meng Dezhi, Liu Ping, Pan Ruochi, Zhou Junqi, Zhou Qingwu, Su Wanghui, Yuan Cunzhe, Zhang Jin, Jia Haonan, Hui Shuqing, Wang Xia, Yan Jian.

Introduction

Future market competition will not only be competition between individual enterprises, but also competition between industrial chains and supply chains.

With the deep integration with the industry, the supply chain is accelerating its transformation to digitalization, and a comprehensive and systematic change has taken place from the underlying logic to the top-level architecture.

Its system structure has evolved from "chain" to "network", and its strategic goal has changed from economic benefit growth to overall supply chain value creation.

The model has changed from business-driven to data-driven, and the technical means have upgraded from a single enterprise's supply chain management system to an integrated digital platform across enterprises.

The digital supply chain is a new form of supply chain. Enterprises design, build and manage digital supply chains generally follow the current situation assessment, gap assessment and The general process of analysis, strategy formulation, action plan establishment, operation implementation and continuous optimization. However, in the specific process, there are also challenges in building the target The lack of clear standards, implementation plans, and level identification criteria, as well as the difficulty in quantitative evaluation of overall effectiveness, have seriously restricted the company's The industry is advancing the pace of digital transformation and upgrading of the supply chain.

The formulation of this document can effectively guide enterprises to use maturity evaluation as a means to identify pain points, grasp development priorities, and create efficient, The flexible and controllable digital supply chain system can also provide reference for relevant research institutions to carry out research related to digital supply chain, which is of great significance to promoting The digital transformation and upgrading of the industry is of great significance.

Digital Supply Chain Maturity Model

1 Scope

This document establishes the construction principles of the digital supply chain maturity model and stipulates the composition, maturity and The maturity levels, assessment domains and assessment subdomains, and digital supply chain maturity requirements are summarized in this article.

This document is applicable to enterprises in their digital supply chain maturity assessment, system design, capacity building and improvement.

It provides reference for scientific research institutes, third-party service providers, etc. that conduct theoretical research, consulting services, and solution development for digital supply chains.

2 Normative references

GB/T 23050

3 Terms and definitions

The terms and definitions defined in GB/T 23050 and the following apply to this document.

4 Abbreviations

The following abbreviations apply to this document.

CRM. Customer Relationship Management ERP. Enterprise Resource Planning SRM. Supplier Relationship Management WMS. Warehouse Management System

5 Principles for Building a Digital Supply Chain Maturity Model