GB/T 44733-2024Evaluation indicators for national forest village (English PDF)

Foreword

This document is in accordance with the provisions of GB/T 1.1-2020 "Guidelines for standardization work Part 1: Structure and drafting rules for standardization documents". Drafting is required.

Please note that some of the contents of this document may involve patents. The issuing organization of this document does not assume the responsibility for identifying patents.

This document was proposed by the State Forestry and Grassland Administration.

This document is under the jurisdiction of the National Technical Committee on Afforestation Standardization (SAC/TC 385).

This document was drafted by: Beijing Forestry University, State Forestry and Grassland Administration, and Northwest Survey and Planning Institute of State Forestry and Grassland Administration.

The main drafters of this document are: Li Xiong, Ma Jia, Wu Xiuli, Zheng Xi, Liu Yi, Yang Hui, Hu Nan, Wang Peiyan, Ge Yunyu, Shao Ming, Li Fangzheng, Liu Chang, and Ma Hao.

National Forest Village Evaluation Indicators

1 Scope

This document establishes the evaluation index system for national forest villages, provides the content of the evaluation indicators, and describes the indicator calculation method.

This document is applicable to the forest and village evaluation management organized by the forestry administrative department of the State Council, and the forest and village evaluation management participation organized by local organizations. Follow the instructions.

2 Normative references

GB/T 15776

GB/T 44347-2024

3 Terms and Definitions

The following terms and definitions apply to this document.

4 Evaluation Index System

The national forest village evaluation index system consists of 6 first-level indicators and 23 second-level indicators.

landscape, natural landscape, ecological protection, biodiversity, human settlement environment, etc.; in terms of rural greening, the village green coverage rate, surrounding Greening, yard greening, public green space, abandoned land greening, etc.; greening quality evaluation of plant selection, seedling selection, greening configuration, etc.

Content. In terms of greening management and protection, the forest chief system, management and protection system, greening achievement management and protection, disaster prevention and control, etc. are evaluated; in terms of green industry, the masses are evaluated Increase income, develop characteristic industries, etc.; in terms of rural ecological culture, evaluate the protection of ancient and famous trees, folk forests and other ecological and cultural heritage, and popularize natural science.

Education, public participation, etc. The indicator system is shown in Figure 1.