Valid

GB/T 27420-2018Conformity assessment—Application guide for evaluation and expression of uncertainty in biological sample measurement (English PDF)

合格评定 生物样本测量不确定度评定与表示应用指南

Preview PDF

This is a limited preview

Buy now to download the full PDF (55 pages)

Need quotation for your management?

Get a formal quotation for GB/T 27420-2018 in 30 minutes.

Issued by

SAMR; SAC

Level / Type

National · Recommended

Issue date

May 14, 2018

Implementation date

December 1, 2018

Scope

GB/T 27420-2018 is the English-translated version of 合格评定 生物样本测量不确定度评定与表示应用指南.

GB/T 27420-2018 is a Chinese guide to evaluating and expressing the uncertainty of quantitative measurements on samples of biological origin in conformity assessment.

It defines the vocabulary used, from measurand, metrological traceability and reference measurement procedures to precision, bias, standard, combined and expanded uncertainty and coverage factor, and classifies measurement procedures into five types according to their traceability.

It explains the bottom-up, top-down and Monte Carlo methods and Type A and Type B evaluation, then gives separate strategies for reference and routine measurement procedures, covering sources of uncertainty, the reporting of results and review.

It does not deal with biological variation or with pre- and post-measurement processes. Medical and testing laboratories use it. It was issued on 14 May 2018 and has applied since 1 December 2018.

Found what you need?

Document preview — GB/T 27420-2018

National Standard of the People's Republic of China

ICS
03.120.20
Classification
A 00

Issued by: State Administration for Market Regulation; Standardization Administration of the PRC

Contents

  • Foreword
  • Introduction
  • 1 Scope
  • 2 Normative references
  • 3 Terms and Definitions
  • 4 conventions and symbols
  • 5 Measurement Overview
  • 5.1 Metrological traceability of measurement results
  • 5.2 Uncertainty of measurement results
  • 6 Measurement uncertainty measurement method
  • 6.1 Overview of assessment methods
  • 6.2 Class A and Class B assessment of measurement uncertainty components
  • 6.3 Synthesis uncertainty and representation
  • 7 Uncertainty evaluation and representation of measurement results of reference measurement procedures
  • 7.1 Requirements for measurement uncertainty assessment
  • 7.2 Potential sources and control requirements for measurement uncertainty
  • 7.3 Measurement uncertainty assessment strategy
  • 7.4 Measurement results and uncertainty representation
  • 7.5 Review of the measurement uncertainty program
  • 8 Uncertainty evaluation and representation of measurement results of routine measurement procedures
  • 8.1 Requirements for measurement uncertainty assessment
  • 8.2 Potential sources and control requirements for measurement uncertainty
  • 8.3 Measurement uncertainty assessment strategy
  • 8.4 Measurement results and uncertainty representation
  • 8.5 Review of the measurement uncertainty procedure
  • Appendix A (informative) Conventions and symbols used in this standard
  • Appendix B (informative) Commonly used inclusion probability p value, inclusion factor k value and t value
  • Appendix C (informative) Calculation of the degree of freedom of the standard uncertainty component of Class B assessment
  • Appendix D (informative) Example of measurement uncertainty assessment Reference

Foreword

This standard was drafted in accordance with the rules given in GB/T 1.1-2009.

Introduction

The complete measurement results should include information that characterizes the dispersion of the results, ie measurement uncertainty, which has become a consensus in the measurement field. Used for the measurement of biological samples. An understanding of the measurement uncertainty helps to more accurately interpret and apply the measured values, especially when the measured values are When a certain decision limit is close, at the same time, measurement uncertainty is also an important indicator of measurement quality.

At present, the basic document of the internationally announced uncertainty assessment is the Guide to Measurement Uncertainty (ISO /IEC Guide 98-3. GuidetotheExpressionofUncertaintyinMeasurement, GUM..1995), GUM explains in principle that the measurement is not The degree of certainty and its principle of assessment. Common methods include. bottom-up methods, top-down methods, and Monte Carlo method. Biological sample measurements have more complex sources of uncertainty, such as imperfect definition of analytes, unstable samples, and inability to trace Source to SI unit, measuring the "activity" of the substance, complex matrix, and usually taking the value of a single measurement in the field of medical inspection as a result Etc., which leads to the uncertainty of assessing the measurement results of biological samples. In actual work, it is difficult to meet the method requirements as easily as chemical analysis. The ideal conditions or their complexity are in conflict with the detection needs. This standard is based on the classification of biological sample metrology traceability, according to the conventional The different characteristics of the measurement method and the reference measurement method, and the strategies, methods and steps for the uncertainty assessment that can be taken under different conditions are given. Application guide.

The content of this standard mainly relates to the uncertainty assessment of biological sample measurement process, without involving biological variation, pre-measurement and post-measurement. The effect of the process on the dispersion of results, and this does not mean that they are not important. In order to better explain and utilize the measurement results, the laboratory should combine practical work. Make a demand, focus on its potential impact on the outcome, and explore ways to properly control and express its impact.

1 Scope

This standard is an application guide for the assessment and presentation of the uncertainty of quantitative measurements of biosourced samples in the field of conformity assessment.

This standard applies to the assessment of the uncertainty of test results related to the measurement process, but does not include biological variation, pre-measurement and post-measurement. The effect of the process on the measurement results.

2 Normative references

The following documents are indispensable for the application of this document. For dated references, only dated versions apply to this document. For undated references, the latest edition (including all amendments) applies to this document.

GB/T 8170 Numerical Rounding Rules and Representation and Determination of Limit Values

GB/T 19702 Description of the reference measurement procedure for the measurement of the amount of biological samples of in vitro diagnostic medical devices

GB/T 21415 in vitro diagnostic medical device biological sample medium quantity measurement calibrator and control substance evaluation Source

GB/T 21919 Requirements for Laboratory Medical Reference Measurement Laboratory

GB/T 22576 Medical laboratory quality and capacity requirements

General requirements for GB/T 27025 testing and calibration laboratory capabilities

GB/T 27407 laboratory quality control using statistical quality assurance and control chart technology to evaluate the performance of analytical measurement systems

GB/T 27411 Test Laboratory Commonly Used Uncertainty Evaluation Method and Representation

ISO 80000-1 Quantity and Units Part 1. General (Quantitiesandunits-Part 1. General)

3 Terms and definitions

The following terms and definitions apply to this document.

3.1 Measurand

The amount to be measured.

3.2 Metrological traceability

Through the uninterrupted calibration chain specified in the document, the measurement results are linked to the reference object, and each calibration in the calibration chain will Introduce measurement uncertainty.

3.3 Measurement principle

Used as a basis for measurement.

3.4 Measurement method

A general description of the logical arrangement given for the operations used in the measurement process.

3.5 Measurement procedure

Based on one or more measurement principles and a given measurement method, based on the measurement model and the calculations required to obtain the measurement results, A detailed description of the amount.

3.6 Reference measurement procedure

When calibrating or setting a standard substance, the measurement procedure used to provide the measurement results is suitable for evaluation by the same amount of other The measurement accuracy of the measured magnitude obtained by the measurement procedure.

3.7 Primary reference measurement procedure; primary reference procedure

A reference measurement procedure used to obtain measurements that are not related to the same type of measurement standard.

3.8 Regular measurement procedure

The measurement procedure used to test samples, whose measurements usually require metrology traceability.

3.9 Measuring system

A set of one or more measuring instruments that are assembled and adapted to give a measured amount of information within a specified interval, usually including He is equipped with devices such as reagents and power supplies.

3.10 Matrix effect

Sample characteristics that affect the measurement and measurable values independent of the presence of the analyte.

3.11 Reference material; RM

Substances with specific properties that are sufficiently uniform and stable, whose properties have proven to be suitable for the intended use in measurement or nominal property inspection.

3.12 Certified reference material; CRM

A document issued by an authority that provides one or more characteristics of uncertainty and traceability obtained using an effective procedure The standard substance of the quantity.

3.13 Calibration

The first step in a set of operations under specified conditions is to determine the relationship between the magnitude provided by the measurement standard and the corresponding indication.

Then, this information is used to determine the relationship between the measurement results obtained by the indication value, where the measurement value provided by the measurement standard and the corresponding indication value have inaccurate measurement. Degree.

3.14 Measurement accuracy; accuracy

The degree to which the measured value is measured and its true value.

3.15 Measurement trueness; trueness

Infinitely repeated measures the degree of agreement between the average of the magnitudes obtained and a reference magnitude.

3.16 Measurement precision; precision

Under the specified conditions, the measured value or the degree of agreement between the measured values is repeated for the same or similar object to be measured.

3.17 Measurement repeatability; repeatability

Measurement precision under a set of repetitive measurement conditions.

3.18 Repeatability condition of measurement; repeatability condition

Same measurement procedure, same operator, same measurement system, same operating conditions and same location, and the same or similar in a short time A set of measurement conditions that are like repeated measurements by the measured object.

Note: In chemistry, the term "intra-sequence precision measurement conditions" is sometimes used to mean "repetitive measurement conditions."

3.19 Measurement reproducibility; reproducibility

Measurement precision under reproducible measurement conditions.

3.20 Reproducibility condition of measurement; reproducibility condition

A set of measurement conditions for different locations, different operators, different measurement systems, and repeated measurements of the same or similar objects.

3.21 Intermediate measurement precision; intermediate precision

Measurement precision under precision measurement conditions during a set of periods.

3.22 Intermediate precision condition of measurement; intermediate precision condition

Except for the same measurement procedure, the same location, and a set of measurements that repeat measurements on the same or similar subject over a longer period of time In addition to the quantitative conditions, other conditions involving changes may also be included.

3.23 Within-laboratory reproducibility

Measurement precision under reproducible measurement conditions in the same laboratory.

3.24 Within-laboratory reproducibility condition

Reproducible measurement conditions in the same laboratory.

Note 1. Indoor reproducibility conditions are the measurement conditions for the greatest variation in precision in the same laboratory.

Note 2. For some laboratories, there may not be multiple measurement systems, and the precision may indicate the maximum possible imprecision measurement conditions.

Note 3. Indoor reproducibility conditions and period precision conditions are not strictly defined. When applied, the description of conditions should include changed and unchanging conditions and How much has actually changed.

3.25 Measurement error; error

The measured magnitude is subtracted from the reference magnitude.

3.26 Measurement bias; bias

An estimate of the system measurement error.

3.27 Measurement uncertainty; uncertainty

Based on the information obtained, a non-negative parameter that imparts dispersibility to the measured value is characterized.

Note 1. Measurement uncertainty includes components caused by system influences, such as components related to corrections and measurement criteria, and defined uncertainties. Sometimes the estimated system impact is not corrected, but treated as an uncertainty component.

Note 2. This parameter can be such as the standard deviation (or its specific multiple) called the standard measurement uncertainty, or the interval half width including the probability.

Note 3. Measurement uncertainty generally consists of several components. Some of these components can be based on a statistical distribution of a series of measurements, according to the class A of measurement uncertainty. The assessment was assessed and characterized by experimental standard deviation. Other components can be estimated based on the probability distribution of experience or other information. The Class B assessment of certainty is assessed and also characterized by standard deviation.

Note 4. Generally, for a given set of information, the measurement uncertainty corresponds to the amount of magnitude assigned to the measurement. A change in this value will result in a corresponding inaccuracy The change in the degree.

3.28 Standard uncertainty; standard measurement uncertainty

Measurement uncertainty expressed in standard deviation.

3.29 Type A evaluation of measurement uncertainty; Type A evaluation

The measurement uncertainty component is evaluated by the statistical analysis method for the measured value under the specified measurement conditions.

Note: The specified measurement conditions refer to repetitive measurement conditions, period precision measurement conditions, or reproducibility measurement conditions.

3.30 Type B evaluation of measurement uncertainty; Type B evaluation

The measurement uncertainty component is evaluated by a method different from the measurement uncertainty class A assessment.

Example: The rating is based on the following information.

---The amount of authority issued by the authority;

--- The amount of certified reference material;

--- Calibration certificate;

--- Instrument drift;

--- The accuracy level of the measured measuring instrument;

--- Limit values inferred based on personnel experience, etc.

3.31 Combined standard uncertainty; combined standard measurement uncertainty

The standard measurement uncertainty of the output obtained from the standard measurement uncertainty for each input in a measurement model.

Note: In the case of input quantities related in the measurement model, the covariance must be considered when calculating the synthetic standard uncertainty.

3.32 Expanded uncertainty; expanded measurement uncertainty

The composite standard uncertainty is the product of a numerical factor greater than one.

Note 1. This factor depends on the type of probability distribution of the output in the measurement model and the selected inclusion probability.

Note 2. The term "factor" in this definition refers to the inclusion factor.

3.33 Coverage interval

An interval containing a measured set of magnitudes determined based on the available information, the measured value falling within the interval with a certain probability.

Note 1. The inclusion interval is not necessarily centered on the selected measured value.

Note 2. The inclusion interval should not be called a "confidence interval" to avoid confusion with statistical concepts.

Note 3. The inclusion interval can be derived from the extended measurement uncertainty.

3.34 Coverage probability

The probability of including a measured set of magnitudes within a specified inclusion interval.

Note 1. To avoid confusion with statistical concepts, inclusion probabilities should not be called confidence levels.

Note 2. The inclusion of probability in GUM is also called "level of confidence".

Note 3. The inclusion probability replaces the "confidence level" that has been used.

3.35 Coverage factor

To obtain extended uncertainty, a number greater than one that is multiplied by the synthetic standard uncertainty.

Note: The inclusion factor is usually indicated by the symbol k.

3.36 Probability distribution

Give a (random variable) function that takes a random variable to take any given value or the probability of a given set.

3.37 Distribution function

For each threshold, a function is given for the probability that the random variable X is less than or equal to xi. GX(xi)=Pr(X <=xi)

3.38 Probability density function

The derivative of the distribution function, if the derivative exists, then gX(xi)=dGX(xi)/dxi, where GX(xi) is the distribution function and X is the random variable.

3.39 Normal distribution

The probability distribution of the continuous random variable X.

3.40 t distribution

The probability distribution of the continuous random variable X.

3.41 Distribution propagation

A method of determining the probability distribution of the output by applying a probability distribution of the input quantities associated with the output.

4 Conventions and symbols

See Appendix A for the conventions and symbols used in this standard.

5 Measurement overview

5.1 Metrological traceability of measurement results

5.1.1 Tracing to international or national standards is the basis for the comparison of measurement results.

5.1.2 The amount of some biological parameters is not yet available in metrologically recognized international or national standards. According to GB/T 21415, according to the measurement knot The metrological traceability of fruit is divided into the following five types of measurement procedures for biological samples.

a) Type I, with a primary reference measurement procedure and a primary calibrator, can be traced to the SI unit measurement procedure;

b) Type II, with internationally agreed reference measurement procedures (non-primary) and internationally agreed calibrators, cannot be traced to SI units Measuring procedure;

c) Type III, with internationally agreed reference measurement procedures (non-primary), no internationally agreed calibrators, not traceable to SI units Measuring procedure;

d) Type IV, with internationally agreed calibrators (non-primary), no internationally agreed reference measurement procedures, cannot be traced to SI units Measuring procedure;

e) Type V, no internationally agreed reference measurement procedures, no internationally agreed calibrators, and cannot be traced to SI units in measurement program.

5.1.3 In the absence of calibrators and reference measurement procedures, the results of the alignment can be compared to the reference material of the protocol or The mean of the protocol method.

5.2 Uncertainty of measurement results

5.2.1 The purpose of the measurement is to determine the value to be measured. The measurement result is usually only an approximation or an estimate of the measured value. Complete measurement junction If you need to attach a statement of uncertainty with the results.

5.2.2 There are many potential factors affecting the measurement results, including but not limited to the following factors.

a) the definition of the measurement is incomplete;

b) the reproduction of the definition of the measurement is not perfect;

c) insufficient representation of the sample being measured;

d) insufficient understanding of the impact of the measurement on environmental conditions or imperfect measurement or control of environmental conditions;

e) personnel reading error;

f) limits on instrument resolution or identification thresholds;

g) the measurement standards and the magnitude of the reference materials are inaccurate;

h) the values of constants and other parameters obtained from the outside and used in the data reduction algorithm are inaccurate;

i) approximations and assumptions in measurement methods and procedures;

j) repeating the variability of the measurement process under seemingly identical conditions;

k) Factors that have not been recognized or recognized.

5.2.3 The factors affecting the measurement results are not necessarily independent of each other. For example, some factors in 5.2.2a)~i) may contribute to j).

6 Evaluation method of measurement uncertainty

6.1 Overview of assessment methods

6.1.1 The exact value of the contribution that causes the measurement result to produce an error, although unknown or unknown, but with the random effects and systems that cause the error The uncertainty associated with the impact is measurable. Measurement uncertainty can be assessed in a variety of ways, and the assessment methods described in this document include. Bottom-up method (hereinafter referred to as bottom-up method) (6.1.2), top-down method (hereinafter referred to as Top-down method) (6.1.3) and Monte Carlo method (hereinafter referred to as MCM method) (6.1.4).

6.1.2 The bottom-up method focuses on how the input affects the results. The evaluation steps include.

a) The definition is measured. The accuracy of the measurement depends on the level of detail defined or specified by the measurement and is measured for the required accuracy. The definition should be complete enough to guarantee the uniqueness of its value.

b) mathematically express the relationship between the input quantity Xi related to the measured Y and the measured Y. Y=f(X1,,XN), function f shall contain each quantity, including all corrections and corrections for components that have a significant influence on the uncertainty of the measurement results. factor.

c) Determine the estimated value xi of the input quantity Xi, either based on a statistical analysis of a series of observations or by other methods.

d) Evaluate the standard uncertainty u(xi) for each input estimate xi. […]

......
This preview omits tables, figures, formulas and parts of the technical clauses. The complete document — 55 pages — is available in the English PDF.

Referenced standards

Similar standards

How to Download GB/T 27420-2018

  1. 1

    Add to cart

    Click "Download PDF" on this page and choose "Buy this standard". You can add more standards before checkout.

  2. 2

    Checkout

    Enter your email and billing details. Payment is processed securely by Stripe (cards or bank transfer). Prefer bank details? Request a quotation (min. order $300).

  3. 3

    Instant delivery (0–9 sec)

    Delivery is automatic: within seconds of payment you'll receive an email with a secure download link. The link stays valid for 72 hours.

  4. 4

    Invoice included

    A tax invoice is attached to the confirmation email. Need a custom invoice? Contact us.

Related Standards

English PDF
55 pages
Instant delivery (0–9 sec)
Invoice included
View Cart

Secure payment via Stripe

Payments accepted

VisaMastercardAmerican ExpressApple PayGoogle PayStripe

GB/T 27420-2018

$710.00