Valid

GB/T 47725-2026Micro-electromechanical systems (MEMS) technology - Requirements for the reliability evaluation of three-dimensional through-silicon via structures (English PDF)

微机电系统(MEMS)技术 硅通孔三维结构可靠性评价要求

Open the GB/T 47725-2026 preview as PDF

Preview — first pages of GB/T 47725-2026 (full document: 51 pages)

This is a limited preview

Buy now to download the full PDF (51 pages)

Issued by

SAMR; SAC

Level / Type

National · Recommended

Issue date

May 25, 2026

Implementation date

December 1, 2026

Scope

GB/T 47725-2026 is the English-translated version of 微机电系统(MEMS)技术 硅通孔三维结构可靠性评价要求.

GB/T 47725-2026 is the Chinese national standard covering the reliability of through-silicon vias - the copper-filled holes that connect stacked dies, where the mismatch between copper and silicon expansion drives the stress that eventually cracks the via or the layers around it. TSV reliability is the gating question for 3D packaging, which is where the industry is going now that shrinking has slowed. First edition, in force from 1 December 2026. It was issued on 25 May 2026 and takes effect on 1 December 2026, as a first edition. The document is under the responsibility of the Standardization Administration of China. This page is published from the official record of the 2026 edition; the clause text of a standard this recent is not yet in circulation, and the figures, limits and tables it contains are those of the document itself, delivered in full with the English translation.

Document preview — GB/T 47725-2026

National Standard of the People's Republic of China

ICS
31.200
Classification
L 55

Issued by: State Administration for Market Regulation; Standardization Administration of the PRC

Contents

  • 2 Block diagram of S-parameter testing system
  • 5 Failure Modes and Reliability Evaluation
  • 5.2 Reliability Evaluation Items
  • 6 Reliability Evaluation Requirements
  • 6.1 Parameter Evaluation
  • 6.1.1 DC Resistance
  • 6.1.2 Leakage Current
  • 6.1.3 S-parameters
  • 6.1.4 Nonlinearity
  • 6.2 Evaluation of internal and external morphology
  • 6.2.1 Visual inspection
  • 6.2.2 X-ray examination
  • 6.2.3 Sample preparation and microscopic examination
  • 6.3 Evaluation of Thermal Stress Characteristics
  • 6.3.1 Temperature Cycling
  • 6.3.2 Stability Baking
  • 6.3.3 Steady-state lifetime
  • 6.3.4 Steady-state damp heat
  • 6.4 Evaluation of Electrical Stress Characteristics
  • 6.4.1 Time-dependent dielectric breakdown (TDDB) test of dielectric layer
  • 6.4.2 Electromigration Test
  • 6.5 Evaluation of Mechanical Properties
  • 6.5.1 Sweep Frequency Vibration
  • 6.5.2 Mechanical shock
  • 6.5.3 Constant Acceleration
  • 6.6 Interconnection Characteristics Evaluation
  • 6.6.1 Wire Bond Strength

Foreword

The sample condition for TSV three-dimensional structural evaluation should be selected according to the following requirements.

a) Wafers are used for parameter evaluation;

b) Internal and external morphology evaluation uses wafers or chips, with chip-based evaluation used for sample preparation and microscopic examination;

c) Thermal stress characteristic evaluation uses wafers or chips, with steady-state lifetime and steady-state damp heat evaluation using chips;

d) Selection of chips for evaluating electrical stress characteristics;

e) Mechanical property evaluation uses chips fixed on a carrier;

f) Evaluation of interconnect characteristics and selection of chips;

g) Standard samples or chips are used for three-dimensional structural evaluation.

2 Block diagram of S-parameter testing system

6.1.3.2 Reporting Requirements The report should include at least the following.

a) Name and address of the manufacturing unit, product name, batch number, etc.;

b) Test environment. temperature, humidity, cleanliness, etc.;

c) Test equipment. model, name, and serial number;

d) Test temperature;

e) Sample quantity and distribution;

f) Test methods, criteria, test procedures and results, and test duration;

g) S-parameter values;

h) Failure analysis report (if any).

5 Failure Modes and Reliability Evaluation

5.1 Failure Mode Classification The failure modes of TSV three-dimensional structures are classified as follows:

a) Common failure modes in parameter evaluation include. 1) Increased DC resistance caused by defects in the TSV metal layer (such as voids, interface delamination, and cracks at connection points). And the 1dB compression point (P1dB) becomes smaller (i.e., the maximum power of linear operation decreases, and nonlinear effects become more pronounced); 2) Increased leakage current due to defects in the TSV insulation layer (poor coverage, contamination, and via wall defects, etc.); 3) S-parameter anomalies caused by defects in TSV substrate material, hole quality, and metallization quality.

b) Common failure modes in internal and external morphology evaluation include. 1) The structure and dimensions do not match the design; 2) TSV deformation and misalignment; 3) Cracks in the TSV three-dimensional structure; 4) Scratches or breaks in the metallization layer, residual metallization, or defects; 5) Metallization bulges and defects within TSVs with metal only on the sidewalls; 6) Filling metal voids within TSVs that are internally or partially filled with metal; 7) The insulation layer is discontinuous, delaminated, or porous; 8) Cracks, delamination, and voids at the interconnect interface; 9) Bond interface warping, gaps, metal overflow at the bond interface, etc.

c) Common failure modes in thermal stress characteristic evaluation include. cracking of silicon bulk or insulating layer caused by material thermal mismatch, interface delamination, and metal... Protrusions, etc.

d) Common failure modes in electrical stress characteristic evaluation include. uneven electric field distribution and excessive current density caused by structural defects in the TSV. The standard leads to dielectric breakdown and electromigration failure.

e) Common failure modes in mechanical property evaluation include. product fatigue caused by the TSV three-dimensional structure under cyclic stress (vibration). Labor cracks, interface delamination, interconnect failures, cracks in silicon or insulating layers, etc.

f) Common failure modes in interconnect characteristic evaluation include. 1) Wire bond strength test values that do not meet requirements due to surface impurities or defects can, in severe cases, lead to metallization layer defects. Bubbles and peeling appeared; 2) The chip shear strength test value does not meet the requirements due to residual surface impurities or defects.

g) Common failure modes in three-dimensional structural evaluation include. 1) The flexural strength test value does not meet the requirements due to unreasonable TSV layout design or defects in the three-dimensional structure of the TSV; 2) The interlayer bonding strength test value does not meet the requirements due to uneven wafer bonding surfaces, residual interface impurities, etc. 3) The metal composition of the bonding surface does not meet the design requirements.

6.1.1 DC Resistance

6.1.1.1 Evaluation of DC Resistance DC resistance can be used to evaluate the quality of TSV interconnects. Due to the excellent conductivity of metallic materials, the DC resistance of TSVs is very small. When defects exist in a TSV, its DC resistance will increase, and it may even cause an open circuit. The evaluation requirements for the DC resistance of a TSV three-dimensional structure are shown in Table 2.

6.1.1.2 Reporting Requirements The report should include at least the following.

a) Name and address of the manufacturing unit, product name, batch number, etc.;

b) Test environment. temperature, humidity, cleanliness, etc.;

c) Test equipment. model, name, and serial number;

d) Sample quantity and distribution;

e) Test methods, criteria, test procedures and results, and test duration;

f) DC resistance value;

g) Failure analysis report (if any).

6.1.2 Leakage Current

6.1.2.1 Leakage Current Evaluation Leakage current can be used to evaluate the insulation of the TSV sidewall dielectric layer. The main indicators of dielectric layer integrity are dielectric layer continuity, absence of pinholes, and... Uniform thickness. When pinholes appear in the dielectric layer, the leakage current of the TSV to the substrate may increase, or even cause a short circuit. Theoretically, the TSV and the substrate... The resistance between the substrates should be infinite, and the leakage current should be zero. However, when pinholes appear in the TSV dielectric layer, the resistance decreases, and the leakage current increases. The requirements for evaluating leakage current in three-dimensional structures are shown in Table 3.

6.1.2.2 Reporting Requirements The report should include at least the following.

a) Name and address of the manufacturing unit, product name, batch number, etc.;

b) Test environment. temperature, humidity, cleanliness, etc.;

c) Test equipment. model, name, and serial number;

d) Sample quantity and distribution;

e) Test methods, criteria, test procedures and results, and test duration;

f) IV test curve;

g) Failure analysis report (if any).

6.1.3 S-parameters

6.1.3.1 Evaluation of S-parameters S-parameters can be used to evaluate the quality of TSV radio frequency transmission. A network analyzer, combined with a probe station testing system, is used to perform three-dimensional TSV testing. S-parameter measurements of the structure show that a larger aspect ratio reduces the constraints on the layout design required for TSV impedance matching, and improves the bandwidth, insertion loss, and inversion resistance of the TSV. The better the characteristics such as radiation loss and isolation, the better. The evaluation requirements for the S-parameters of the TSV three-dimensional structure are shown in Table 4. Figure

6.1.4 Nonlinearity

6.1.4.1 Nonlinear Evaluation Nonlinearity can be used to evaluate the quality of high-power radio frequency transmission. This involves using an RF power source, a spectrum analyzer, and an attenuator (if needed), combined with... A probe station testing system is used to perform nonlinear measurements on the three-dimensional structure of a TSV. For the same size, the higher the quality of the TSV metal layer, the more linear the RF transmission. The better the degree of polarization, the stronger the power tolerance and the higher the P1dB; when there are defects in the metal layer, the TSV vertical interconnect exhibits nonlinearity in high-power RF transmission. The more pronounced the thermal effect, the lower the P1dB. The nonlinear evaluation requirements for TSV three-dimensional structures are shown in Table 5.

6.1.4.2 Reporting Requirements The report should include at least the following.

a) Name and address of the manufacturing unit, product name, batch number, etc.;

b) Test environment. temperature, humidity, cleanliness, etc.;

c) Test equipment. model, name, and serial number;

d) Test temperature;

e) Sample quantity and distribution;

f) Test methods, criteria, test procedures and results, and test duration;

h) Failure analysis report (if any).

6.2.1 Visual inspection

6.2.1.1 Visual Inspection Evaluation Visual inspection can be used to evaluate the appearance and manufacturing quality of TSVs. Failures in TSV three-dimensional structures are typically caused by physical damage, such as. TSV internal wall metal bulges, defects, silicon wafer cracks, etc. These damages and defects can be detected through visual inspection using microscopy. TSV three-dimensional structure exterior The evaluation requirements for microscopic examination are shown in Table 6.

6.2.1.2 Reporting Requirements The report should include at least the following.

a) Name and address of the production unit and the evaluation unit, product name, batch number, etc.;

b) Test environment. temperature, humidity, cleanliness, etc.;

c) Test equipment. model, name, and serial number;

d) Sample quantity and distribution;

e) Test methods, criteria, test procedures and results, and test duration;

f) Failure modes and quantities;

g) Failure analysis report (if any).

6.2.2 X-ray examination

6.2.2.1 Evaluation of X-ray examination X-ray inspection can be used to evaluate the internal process quality of TSVs. It can also be used to inspect internal defects in TSVs that are filled or partially filled with metal, such as filler metal. If the structure is hollow or has a broken metal component, and cannot be detected by visual microscopy, it can be evaluated using X-ray imaging. TSV three-dimensional structure X-ray The evaluation requirements for radiographic inspection are shown in Table 7.

6.2.2.2 Reporting Requirements The report should include at least the following.

a) Name and address of the production unit and the evaluation unit, product name, batch number, etc.;

b) Test environment. temperature, humidity, cleanliness, etc.;

c) Test equipment. model, name, and serial number;

d) Sample quantity and distribution;

e) Test methods, criteria, test procedures and results, and test duration;

f) Failure modes and quantities;

g) Failure analysis report (if any).

6.2.3 Sample preparation and microscopic examination

6.2.3.1 Sample preparation and microscopic evaluation Microscopic examination of samples can be used to evaluate the internal manufacturing quality of TSVs. Failure of TSV three-dimensional structures is related to inherent internal structural defects, for example... For example, there may be discontinuities in the TSV insulating layer or obvious gaps at the bonding interfaces of stacked TSV wafers. These defects can be evaluated through sample preparation and microscopic inspection. Price. The requirements for TSV three-dimensional structure sample preparation and microscopic examination evaluation are shown in Table 8.

6.2.3.2 Reporting Requirements The report should include at least the following.

a) Name and address of the production unit and the evaluation unit, product name, batch number, etc.;

b) Test environment. temperature, humidity, cleanliness, etc.;

c) Test equipment. model, name, and serial number;

d) Sample quantity and distribution;

e) Test methods, criteria, test procedures and results, and test duration;

f) Failure modes and quantities;

g) Failure analysis report (if any).

6.3.1 Temperature Cycling

6.3.1.1 Temperature Cycling Evaluation The purpose of temperature cycling is to determine the ability of TSV three-dimensional structure products to withstand high and low temperatures, and the effect of alternating high and low temperatures on the product. The impact on the product. Temperature changes may worsen the condition of internal process defects or cause cracks at stress mismatch locations, thus leading to... This can lead to product malfunction, chip cracking, or separation of multilayer structures. Temperature cycling evaluation requirements are shown in Table 9.

6.3.1.2 Reporting Requirements The report should include at least the following.

a) Name and address of the production unit and the evaluation unit, product name, batch number, etc.;

b) Test environment. temperature, humidity, cleanliness, etc.;

c) Test equipment. model, name, and serial number;

d) Sample quantity and distribution;

e) Test methods, criteria, test procedures and results, and test duration;

f) Failure modes and quantities;

g) Failure analysis report (if any).

6.3.2 Stability Baking

6.3.2.1 Stability evaluation during baking The purpose of stability baking is to determine the chip's ability to be used, transported, or stored in high-temperature environments without applying electrical stress. The requirements for stability baking reliability evaluation are shown in Table 10.

6.3.2.2 Reporting Requirements The report should include at least the following.

a) Name and address of the production unit and the evaluation unit, product name, batch number, etc.;

b) Test environment. temperature, humidity, cleanliness, etc.;

c) Test equipment. model, name, and serial number;

d) Sample quantity and distribution;

e) Test methods, criteria, test procedures and results, and test duration;

f) Failure modes and quantities;

g) Failure analysis report (if any).

6.3.3 Steady-state lifetime

6.3.3.1 Steady-state lifetime assessment The purpose of steady-state lifetime evaluation is to assess the effects of time, bias conditions, and temperature on the three-dimensional structure of the TSV. Steady-state lifetime evaluation requirements are detailed below. Table 11.

6.3.3.2 Reporting Requirements The report should include at least the following.

a) Name and address of the production unit and the evaluation unit, product name, batch number, etc.;

b) Test environment. temperature, humidity, cleanliness, etc.;

c) Sample quantity and distribution;

d) Testing instruments. model, name, and serial number;

e) Test methods, criteria, test procedures and results, and test duration;

f) Failure modes and quantities;

g) Failure analysis report (if any).

6.3.4 Steady-state damp heat

6.3.4.1 Steady-state damp heat assessment The purpose of steady-state damp heat evaluation is to assess the effects of bias temperature and humidity on the three-dimensional structure of TSVs in unsealed devices. Steady-state damp heat evaluation requires... Please refer to Table 12.

6.3.4.2 Reporting Requirements The report should include at least the following.

a) Name and address of the production unit and the evaluation unit, product name, batch number, etc.;

b) Test environment. temperature, humidity, cleanliness, etc.;

c) Test equipment. model, name, and serial number;

d) Sample quantity and distribution;

e) Test methods, criteria, test procedures and results, and test duration;

f) Failure modes and quantities;

g) Failure analysis report (if any).

6.4.1 Time-dependent dielectric breakdown (TDDB) test of dielectric layer

6.4.1.1 Evaluation of Time-Related Dielectric Breakdown Lifetime of Dielectric Layer The purpose of TDDB is to evaluate the effects of time, electric field conditions, and temperature on the three-dimensional structure of TSV. The time-dependent dielectric of the dielectric layer... The breakdown evaluation requirements are shown in Table 13.

6.4.1.2 Reporting Requirements The report should include at least the following.

a) Name and address of the production unit and the evaluation unit, product name, batch number, etc.;

b) Test environment. temperature, humidity, cleanliness, etc.;

c) Test equipment. model, name, and serial number;

d) Sample quantity and distribution;

e) Test methods, criteria, test procedures and results, and test duration;

f) Failure modes and quantities;

g) Failure analysis report (if any).

6.4.2 Electromigration Test

6.4.2.1 Electromigration lifetime assessment The purpose of electromigration lifetime testing is to evaluate the effects of time, current conditions, and temperature on the three-dimensional structure of the TSV. Electromigration evaluation requires... See Table 14.

6.4.2.2 Reporting Requirements The report should include at least the following.

a) Name and address of the production unit and the evaluation unit, product name, batch number, etc.;

b) Test environment. temperature, humidity, cleanliness, etc.;

c) Testing instruments. model, name, and serial number;

d) Sample quantity and distribution;

e) Test methods, criteria, test procedures and results, and test duration;

f) Failure modes and quantities;

g) Failure analysis report (if any).

6.5.1 Sweep Frequency Vibration

6.5.1.1 Evaluation of sweep frequency vibration The purpose of swept-frequency vibration is to determine the effect of vibration on the three-dimensional structure of the TSV within a specified frequency range. Sweeped-frequency vibration evaluation requires... See Table 15.

6.5.2 Mechanical shock

6.5.2.1 Mechanical Impact Evaluation The purpose of mechanical shock testing is to evaluate whether the TSV three-dimensional structure is suitable for electronic devices that require exposure to moderately severe shocks. Impacts can disrupt operational characteristics or cause additional vibrations, resulting in structural damage. Mechanical impact evaluation requirements are shown in Table 16.

6.5.2.2 Reporting Requirements The report should include at least the following.

a) Name and address of the production unit and the evaluation unit, product name, batch number, etc.;

b) Test environment. temperature, humidity, cleanliness, etc.;

c) Test equipment. model, name, and serial number;

d) Sample quantity and distribution;

e) Test methods, criteria, test procedures and results, and test duration;

f) Failure modes and quantities;

g) Failure analysis report (if any).

6.5.3 Constant Acceleration

6.5.3.1 Evaluation of constant acceleration The purpose of constant acceleration is to evaluate the structural adaptability and performance stability of the TSV three-dimensional structure under steady-state acceleration conditions. The acceleration evaluation requirements are shown in Table 17.

6.5.3.2 Reporting Requirements The report should include at least the following.

a) Name and address of the production unit and the evaluation unit, product name, batch number, etc.;

b) Test environment. temperature, humidity, cleanliness, etc.;

c) Test equipment. model, name, and serial number;

d) Sample quantity and distribution;

e) Test methods, criteria, test procedures and results, and test duration;

f) Failure modes and quantities;

g) Failure analysis report (if any).

6.6.1 Wire Bond Strength

6.6.1.1 Evaluation of Wire Bond Strength The purpose of wire bond strength testing is to evaluate bond strength or determine whether the bond strength meets specified requirements. Insufficient metal layer adhesion. Delamination of the metal structure may lead to insufficient wire bonding strength. Experiments can be conducted to verify the quality of the metal layer at the orifice of the TSV three-dimensional structure. The completion status of metallization processes such as evaporation, sputtering, or electroplating. Wire bond strength evaluation requirements are shown in Table 18.

6.6.1.2 Reporting Requirements The report should include at least the following.

a) Name and address of the production unit and the evaluation unit, product name, batch number, etc.;

b) Test environment. temperature, humidity, cleanliness, etc.;

c) Test equipment. model, name, and serial number;

d) Sample quantity and distribution;

e) Test methods, criteria, test procedures and results, and test duration;

f) Failure modes and quantities;

g) Failure analysis report (if any).

......
This preview omits tables, figures, formulas and parts of the technical clauses. The complete document — 51 pages — is available in the English PDF.

How to Buy GB/T 47725-2026

  1. 1Add to cart. Click the "Buy GB/T 47725-2026" button on this page. You can add more standards before checkout.
  2. 2Checkout. Enter your email and billing details. Payment is processed securely by Stripe (cards, Apple Pay, Google Pay supported).
  3. 3Instant delivery (0–9 sec). Delivery is automatic: within seconds of payment you'll receive an email with a secure download link. The link stays valid for 72 hours.
  4. 4Invoice included. A tax invoice is attached to the confirmation email. Need a custom invoice? Contact us.

Related Standards

English PDF
51 pages
Instant delivery (0–9 sec)
Invoice included
View Cart

Secure payment via Stripe

Payments accepted

VisaMastercardAmerican ExpressApple PayGoogle PayStripe

GB/T 47725-2026

$425.00

$360.00for partners