Valid

GB/T 47470-2026Cybersecurity technology - Assessment criteria for secure software development capability (English PDF)

网络安全技术 软件安全开发能力评估准则

Open the GB/T 47470-2026 preview as PDF

Preview — first pages of GB/T 47470-2026 (full document: 57 pages)

This is a limited preview

Buy now to download the full PDF (57 pages)

Issued by

SAMR; SAC

Level / Type

National · Recommended

Issue date

April 30, 2026

Implementation date

November 1, 2026

Scope

GB/T 47470-2026 is the English-translated version of 网络安全技术 软件安全开发能力评估准则.

GB/T 47470-2026 is the Chinese national standard covering how an organisation's ability to develop secure software is assessed - the practices expected across requirements, design, coding, testing, release and response, and the evidence that they are actually followed rather than documented. First edition, 19,000 words, in force since 1 November 2026. It was issued on 30 April 2026 and takes effect on 1 November 2026, as a first edition. The document is under the responsibility of the Standardization Administration of China. This page is published from the official record of the 2026 edition; the clause text of a standard this recent is not yet in circulation, and the figures, limits and tables it contains are those of the document itself, delivered in full with the English translation.

Document preview — GB/T 47470-2026

National Standard of the People's Republic of China

ICS
35.030
Classification
L 80

Issued by: State Administration for Market Regulation; Standardization Administration of the PRC

Contents

  • 4 General Principles
  • 5 Elements of Software Security Development Capability
  • 5.1 Security Requirements Analysis
  • 5.2 Security Technology Implementation
  • 5.3 Security Testing
  • 5.6 Safety Management
  • 5.7 Development Support
  • 5.8 Safety Measurement and Improvement
  • 6 Evaluation Methods

4 General Principles

4.1 Software security development capabilities The organization uses the software lifecycle as a framework to analyze the periods in which software security vulnerabilities exist, and constructs a security process and organization for software development. The management of security processes aims to identify potential security threats to software, reduce the likelihood of security vulnerabilities, and prevent software from being intentionally damaged or compromised. Forced to fail security objectives. An organization's software security development capability is acquired through the execution of eight security processes, which include security aspects in software development. The security process comprises five stages. comprehensive requirements analysis, security technology implementation, security testing, security release, and security maintenance. In terms of organizational management, it includes security governance. The three security processes are. management, development support, and security measurement and improvement. The safety process is systematically described according to three levels. process, process area, and basic practices. Among these, process is the highest level. This section describes the safety objective of performing this process, and a set of process areas that indicate that the objective has been successfully achieved; process areas are defined by their... The way the goal and output activities are defined translates into a lower-level process. A process area typically includes a name, a goal, and a set of outputs. Activities; basic practices are the set of activities that implement process domain objectives, used to further describe the intent and mechanisms of the activities. Work products are basic practices. For examples of work products from the process domain, see Appendix A for the outputs of the practice. Based on the three levels mentioned above, software security development consists of 8 security processes, 20 security process areas, and 119 basic practices. An organization's software security development capability is its ability to achieve software security goals through the execution of process activities.

4.2 Ability Level Software security development capability levels are set at five levels, with higher capability levels indicating greater predictability of software security objectives and greater controllability of processes. The stronger the characteristics of effectiveness and execution, the more hierarchical the description of activity features are, with each evolutionary level building upon the previous level. Add new activity features or performance characteristics. The descriptions and activity characteristics of the ability levels are as follows:

a) Level 1. 1) Description. The organization possesses the capability to conduct basic software security development activities, and implements software security development in stages and selectively. Launch related activities; 2) Activity Characteristics. Initial Execution. The organization executes activities related to the software security development process based on internal or external security requirements. An effective mechanism has not been established to ensure the continued operation of related activities.

b) Level 2. 1) Description. The organization possesses the capability to conduct software security development activities in a planned and tracked manner, and can analyze security features. Verification ensures that the software development process is secure and controllable. 2) Activity Characteristics. Executed according to a plan. The organization gradually accumulates process assets and conducts measurement and analysis activities targeting business security objectives. The execution of the verification process conforms to applicable standards and procedures and is reproducible in similar software, but it has not been separated from the group. The organizational level forms a systematic capability.

c) Level 3. 1) Description. The organization possesses the capability to define standardized software security development activities and execute them systematically and in a standardized manner, and can analyze security... Problems were identified and improvement measures were proposed to ensure a consistent software security development process across the organization; 2) Activity Characteristics. Systematic Execution. Defining and standardizing software security development processes, procedures, documents, and tools at the organizational level. Platforms, etc., can be tailored to unique project or work characteristics, and can establish and maintain software security development process assets. The library utilizes tool platforms to conduct process management and development support activities.

d) Level 4. 1) Description. The organization possesses the capability to use metrics data for software security development governance and has the ability to quantitatively control security technology activities. The ability to ensure the efficient achievement of organizational security objectives; 2) Activity Characteristics. Quantitative Control of Execution. Measurable software security development goals are established at the organizational level, and metric indicators are set. The system supports the achievement of security objectives and the control of business risks; it establishes and promotes the use of reusable, modular security assets. Libraries and automated testing toolchains systematically improve the efficiency of software security development.

e) Level 5. 1) Description. The organization possesses the ability to self-optimize software security development activities and processes in the face of complex situations, and can do so in a predictable manner. This involves changing and adjusting organizational-level security objectives and implementation processes. 2) Activity Characteristics. Continuous optimization of execution. Key organizational processes are identified through quantitative assessment of safety objectives and analysis of performance data. Identify and address common and recurring problems, proactively and predictively optimize and improve organizational processes, enhance the effectiveness of specific processes, and ensure the achievement of goals. The software security development process is continuously being optimized and developed.

4.3 Evaluation Model The software security development capability assessment model divides 119 basic practices into 20 process areas based on the software lifecycle, and assigns them to 8 security categories. Throughout the process, five different levels of activity characteristics are defined to provide relevant basic practices for evaluating an organization's implementation of refined process management. The ability to achieve software security goals. The model structure is shown in Figure 1.

5.1 Security Requirements Analysis

5.1.1 Process Description The security requirements analysis process consists of two process areas. establishing a security requirements baseline and supplementing security requirements. Security requirements are designed to achieve organizational goals. Driven by security objectives, we developed a system that aligns with the organization's business requirements through in-depth analysis of laws, regulations, industry oversight, and user access requirements. Establish a baseline of security requirements to ensure that the software complies with security standards during use, while protecting personal information and data security; through network security... The tracking and analysis of risks, including full-incident events, legacy testing defects, and potential vulnerabilities identified through threat modeling, will further inform the development of strategies to improve software security. Additional security requirements for the features. Organizations gain different levels of security requirements analysis capabilities by implementing basic practices in two process areas.

5.1.2 PA01 - Establishing a baseline for security requirements This process domain defines activities related to software compliance, personal information protection, data security, and enhancing software resilience, primarily including the following. content.

a) Summary Description. Analyze compliance requirements for information such as laws and regulations, user access, and industry standards, and identify security vulnerabilities in conjunction with business scenarios. Risk assessment involves establishing a baseline of security requirements tailored to the organization's business needs, ensuring that software meets security compliance, personal information protection, and data security requirements. According to security requirements, it possesses anti-attack capabilities;

b) Objective. To ensure the integrity of security requirements in software development and to guarantee that activity definitions meet basic security requirements;

c) Basic Practice Level Description. The establishment of a safety requirements baseline is divided into 3 levels and 6 basic practices, as shown in Table 1.

5.1.3 PA02 - Supplementary Safety Requirements This process area defines supplementary security requirement activities that enhance software security competitiveness based on the baseline security requirements. These mainly include the following. content.

a) Summary Description. Based on user access requirements, policies and regulations, known security issues in the application software, and legacy security testing issues, Threat modeling identifies security issues, security requirements to meet security strategic planning, and user security vulnerabilities, all within the framework of security needs. Based on the existing framework, security requirements were developed to enhance the software's security competitiveness.

b) Objective. Based on security vulnerabilities encountered by users during actual use, identify corresponding security needs and explore competitive advantages that can improve product security. The security requirements of competitiveness;

c) Basic Practice Level Description. Supplemental security requirements are divided into 3 levels and 5 basic practices, as shown in Table 2.

5.2 Security Technology Implementation

5.2.1 Process Description The process of implementing security technology includes designing a security architecture, managing open-source and third-party components, standardizing secure coding, reviewing code security, and implementing security measures. The entire build process consists of five process areas. Software architecture security analysis and design are crucial foundations for software security, and continuous optimization and improvement of the software architecture are essential. Design can effectively improve the efficiency of secure software development. Meeting the security and compliance requirements of open-source and third-party components is essential for secure implementation. Requirements. Standardized secure coding and code security reviews are essential means of ensuring code security. Organizations achieve different levels of security technology implementation capabilities by implementing basic practices in five process areas.

5.2.2 PA03 - Designing a Security Architecture This process domain defines an architecture analysis that meets security requirements and organizational policies, constructing a set of structural relationships with common components and security policies. The activities mainly include the following.

a) Overview. Implement security requirements, identify and mitigate security threats to the software architecture, conduct attack path analysis, and utilize security technologies. Design specifications, strengthen the implementation of security technologies, extract common security architecture from the organizational level, establish reusable assets, and improve development efficiency;

b) Objective. To analyze the security of the software architecture, improve its security design, and ensure software security at a more abstract, higher level;

c) Basic Practice Level Description. The design of a security architecture is divided into 4 levels and 7 basic practices, as shown in Table 3.

5.2.3 PA04 - Management of Open Source and Third-Party Components This process domain defines activities such as the inspection, management, and configuration of open-source and third-party components, the management, monitoring, and response to resource repositories, mainly including... Includes the following.

a) Overview. Establish reference standards for open-source and third-party components, manage the lifecycle of open-source and third-party components, and ensure the components... References can meet the needs of organizational definition;

b) Objective. To identify third-party commercially used and open-source components, confirm their security and compliance, and reduce the burden on the software development process. China introduces security risks from the outside.

c) Basic Practice Level Description. The management of open source and third-party components is divided into 3 levels and 7 basic practices, as shown in Table 4.

5.2.4 PA05 - Standard Security Coding This process domain defines the standardization activities for code security implementation, comment creation, resource usage, and compilation configuration, mainly including the following.

a) Overview. Establish secure coding standards, and propose specific security requirements for code writing on different operating systems and in different languages. Instructions for summation operations;

b) Objective. To guide developers in standardizing coding practices, improving program security and consistency, and reducing security vulnerabilities and code errors during the coding phase. risk;

c) Basic Practice Level Description. Standardized security coding is divided into 3 levels and 4 basic practices, as shown in Table 5.

5.3 Security Testing

5.3.1 Process Description The security testing process consists of two process areas. establishing security testing procedures and executing security tests. Security testing aims to discover security vulnerabilities. The purpose is to prevent various security problems in software caused by improper design or coding, and to verify that the software meets security requirements and security levels. The process of measuring targets. The proper use of security testing tools and the improvement of security testing techniques are effective means of discovering security vulnerabilities, and establishing organizational-level... Establish safety testing procedures, clarify operating specifications, accumulate testing experience, improve methods to increase test coverage, and effectively guide specific testing activities. implement. Organizations gain different levels of security testing capabilities by implementing basic practices in two process domains.

5.3.2 PA08 - Establish Safety Testing Procedures This process area defines the tools, procedures, test cases, and other activities for performing security testing on software, mainly including the following.

a) Summary Description. To reduce software security risks and minimize security vulnerabilities, based on software security requirements, constraints are clearly defined, and [the following is a summary description] is established. Establish safety testing procedures to guide the conduct of safety testing.

b) Objective. To establish test procedures that meet the organization's defined security policies and software security requirements, and to provide basic security testing methods. Processes and guidelines ensure the rationality of security test design, the correctness, effectiveness, and adequacy of test cases;

c) Basic Practice Level Description. The establishment of safety testing procedures is divided into 2 levels and 5 basic practices, as shown in Table 8.

5.3.3 PA09 - Perform security testing This process defines the requirements for conducting security testing activities, including testing known vulnerabilities, analyzing test data, and conducting adversarial security testing. Tests, attack tests, and tests with malformed input data, mainly include the following.

a) Summary Description. Security tests are performed on the software's security functions, security performance, and third-party component references according to the test plan. Record and analyze the test results, and incorporate them into the software quality measurement and analysis;

b) Objective. To verify that the software security design strategy has been implemented, meets software security requirements, and uncover security vulnerabilities;

c) Basic Practice Level Description. The performance of security testing is divided into 4 levels and 8 basic practices, as shown in Table 9.

5.6 Safety Management

5.6.1 Process Description The security governance process consists of three process areas. security planning, compliance management, and security development and training. The purpose of security governance is to address security issues at the group level. At the organizational level, clearly define security objectives and build a security system. This involves establishing a software security governance system encompassing organizational structure, personnel, processes, and technology, and implementing security measures. The accumulation and reuse of assets throughout the entire process ensures the safe and effective operation of various businesses, helps organizations effectively control compliance risks, and achieve organizational strategy. The security objective. Organizations achieve different levels of security governance capabilities by implementing basic practices across three process areas.

5.6.2 PA14 - Safety Planning This process domain defines organizational security goals, establishes a software security development process system, and clarifies process connections through organizational structure and responsibilities. Activities such as division of labor and performance evaluation optimization mainly include the following.

a) Summary Description. Strategically plan the organization's overall software security development system construction goals and directions, and define performance indicators to ensure... Implementation of relevant policies;

b) Objective. The software security development system supports the achievement of organizational security goals; therefore, it is generally promoted from a high-level strategic perspective. This ensures that the relevant activities can be carried out smoothly;

c) Explanation of Basic Practice Levels. Safety planning is divided into 3 levels and 7 basic practices, as shown in Table 14.

5.6.3 PA15 - Compliance Management This process domain clearly defines the organization's requirements to comply with national, regional, and industry safety regulations, interpret and analyze the dynamics of laws, regulations, and standards, and apply the latest... Best practices include conducting compliance audits and management of both themselves and their suppliers, which mainly include the following.

a) Summary Description. Through benchmarking analysis of laws, regulations, and standards, practical experience, and supplier compliance management, ensure the organization's software products are sold reliably. Safety and compliance of camp activities;

b) Objective. To ensure that the software products and supporting services meet the legal, regulatory, and standard requirements of the countries and regions where they are sold, and to guarantee the software products... This enhances the organization's competitiveness and, consequently, enables its sustainable development.

c) Explanation of Basic Practice Levels. Compliance management is divided into 3 levels and 6 basic practices, as shown in Table 15.

5.6.4 PA16 - Security Development Training This process domain supports the establishment and maintenance of training capabilities for various roles within the organization, developing personnel's skills and knowledge to enable them to perform tasks efficiently. They should define the security development training requirements for their roles, which mainly include the following.

a) Summary Description. Organize specialized training for internal and external personnel, guide the implementation of secure development technologies, share lessons learned, and interpret policies and regulations. The goal is to ensure that staff at all levels of the organization understand and prioritize safe development, and to guarantee the implementation of safe development requirements.

b) Objective. To ensure that personnel at each stage of the software development process meet the corresponding security capability requirements;

c) Basic Practice Level Description. Security development training is divided into 3 levels and 5 basic practices, as shown in Table 16.

5.7 Development Support

5.7.1 Process Description The development support process consists of two process areas. tool environment security and configuration management. The purpose of the development support process is to improve the software lifecycle. Improve the efficiency of the execution of the five major security processes and related security activities, reduce the risk of security vulnerabilities introduced by the related processes, and develop support processes during implementation. Use it in conjunction with other technologies during development activities. Organizations gain different levels of development support capabilities by implementing basic practices in two process areas.

5.7.2 PA17 - Tool and Environmental Safety This process area is implemented during the software development process to ensure the security of the technical tools used and the development and testing environments involved. The activities mainly include the following.

a) Overview. Provides resource support for security technology tools during the software development process, including auditing and hardening these tools. Protective measures are in place to ensure the security of the development environment and prevent software source code leaks or malicious code injection due to tool security issues. Risks, etc.

b) Objective. To ensure the security and compliance of security technology tools and development environments, and to guarantee the accuracy of software execution results;

c) Basic Practice Level Description. Tool environment safety is divided into 3 levels and 5 basic practices, as shown in Table 17.

5.7.3 PA18 - Configuration Management This process domain defines activities related to the implementation, monitoring, and review of security configurations for software, services, and networks, and mainly includes the following.

a) Summary Description. Manage the integrity of work products using configuration identification, version control, change control, and auditing;

b) Objective. To reduce losses in security software development efforts and increase the ability to provide users with the correct version of the solution;

c) Basic Practice Level Description. Configuration management is divided into 3 levels and 7 basic practices, as shown in Table 18.

5.8 Safety Measurement and Improvement

5.8.1 Process Description The safety measurement and improvement process consists of two process areas. safety measurement and safety problem analysis and resolution. The purpose of safety measurement and improvement is... It involves measuring activities throughout the software lifecycle, using statistical and quantitative techniques to analyze security data, and objectively reflecting the software security development process. To understand the true state of processes and software, identify existing problems and areas for improvement, and predict future developments in software security. Organizations achieve different levels of safety measurement and improvement capabilities by implementing basic practices in two process areas.

5.8.2 PA19 - Safety Measurement Security metrics are the methods used in the software security development process to define and implement metrics, indicators, and techniques for measuring inputs, results, and the environment. Tools, metrics analysis, and other activities.

a) Overview. Focus the management of software security development on input, results, and environmental performance to maximize the organization's satisfaction. Security objectives.

b) Objective. To use metrics to manage software security development quality and process performance.

c) Basic Practice Level Description. Safety measurement is divided into 5 levels and 9 basic practices, as shown in Table 19.

5.8.3 PA20 - Safety Issues Analysis and Resolution This process area is defined as ensuring the sustainability of business processes by analyzing and addressing security issues that arise during the software lifecycle. The investigation and continuous improvement of software security quality activities mainly include the following.

a) Summary Description. Introduce defect management for security identification, identify common issues in security incidents, improve the development process, and prevent similar incidents. The problem occurred again;

b) Objective. To identify software security vulnerabilities, select typical security incident issues, conduct root cause analysis and solutions, and improve through data analysis. Improve the performance of the secure development process and enhance software quality and production efficiency;

c) Explanation of Basic Practice Levels. Safety problem analysis and resolution is divided into 5 levels and 9 basic practices, as shown in Table 20.

6 Evaluation Methods

6.1 Evaluation Conditions To obtain sufficient and credible evidence of activity execution to assess an organization's ability to conduct software security development, a systematic and traceable approach should be adopted. The evaluation activities were conducted using a retrospective approach, and evidence was collected and summarized. Specific evaluation criteria are as follows:

a) During the software security development process, the entire lifecycle is carried out by a single organization;

b) Work products should cover all processes, process areas, and basic practices included in the assessment level;

c) When there is a successor or subordinate relationship between two or more logical entity pieces of evidence, they are usually traceable. Example. Software security features and test security cases are often traced back to software security requirements.

6.2 Methods for forming evaluation results Based on the software security development capability level applied for by the organization, and according to the assessment model, the process execution at that level will be conducted in a tiered manner. Compliance assessment. Each level of compliance assessment results is categorized as compliant, substantially compliant, and non-compliant. If none of the eight safety processes have any non-compliance items, then... The organization has been determined to possess this level of capability. See Appendix C for the specific assessment process and activities.

6.3 Graded Assessment The assessment of software security development capabilities includes four aspects. basic assessment practices, assessment process areas, assessment process, and result determination.

a) Level 1. 1) Assessment of basic practices. Basic practices are the smallest unit of activity; failure to perform a Level 1 basic practice activity is considered non-compliance. A judgment that has been implemented but is incomplete is considered basically compliant; a judgment that has been implemented completely and is traceable is considered compliant. 2) Evaluation Process Area. Set a compliance rate threshold for the basic practical activities corresponding to the process area at level one. The compliance rate threshold should not be lower than [the threshold value is missing from the original text]. 50% compliance rate. If the compliance rate is less than the threshold, the process domain is considered non-compliant; if the compliance rate is greater than (or equal to) the threshold, and there are no non-compliance rates, the process domain is considered non-compliant. If the item meets the criteria, the process domain determines it to be compliant; otherwise, it is considered basically compliant. 3) Evaluation Process. If any process area contained in the process is non-compliant, then the process is non-compliant, and all process areas are non-compliant. If it meets the requirements, the process determines it to be compliant; otherwise, it is considered basically compliant. 4) Result Assessment. No non-compliance items were found in the eight security processes, indicating that the organization possesses Level 1 capability and is able to conduct preliminary software security work. Development activities can provide software services that meet security requirements.

b) Level 2. 1) Assessment of basic practices. Basic practices at level two and below that are not implemented are deemed non-compliant; those implemented but not adequately implemented are deemed non-compliant. The judgment is basically compliant; the judgment is compliant if the implementation is complete and traceable. 2) Evaluation Process Area. The process area corresponds to the basic practices at level two and below, and sets compliance rate thresholds for each level of practice activities. The compliance rate threshold should not be lower than 50%. If the compliance rate is less than the threshold, the process area is judged as non-compliant; if the compliance rate is greater than the threshold, the process area is judged as non-compliant. If the threshold is (or equal to) met and there are no non-compliant items, the process domain is considered compliant; otherwise, it is considered basically compliant. 3) Evaluation Process. If any process area contained in the process is non-compliant, then the process is non-compliant, and all process areas are non-compliant. If it meets the requirements, the process determines it to be compliant; otherwise, it is considered basically compliant. 4) Result Judgment. No non-conformities were found in the eight safety processes, indicating that the organization possesses Level 2 capability and can carry out safety processes in a planned and tracked manner. Software security development activities can analyze and verify software security features, ensuring that the software security development process is controllable.

c) Level 3. 1) Assessment of basic practices. Basic practices at level three and below that are not implemented are deemed non-compliant; those implemented but not adequately implemented are considered non-compliant. The judgment is basically compliant; the judgment is compliant if the implementation is complete and traceable. 2) Evaluation Process Area. The process area corresponds to the basic practices at level three and below, and sets compliance rate thresholds for each level of practice activity. The compliance rate threshold should not be lower than 50%. If the compliance rate is less than the threshold, the process area is judged as non-compliant; if the compliance rate is greater than the threshold, the process area is judged as non-compliant. If the threshold is met (or equal to) and there are no non-compliant items, the process domain is considered compliant; otherwise, it is considered basically compliant. 3) Evaluation Process. If any one of the process areas contained in the process is non-compliant, then the entire process area is non-compliant. If it meets the requirements, the process determines it to be compliant; otherwise, it is considered basically compliant. 4) Result Judgment. No non-conformities were found in the eight safety processes, indicating that the organization possesses Level 3 capability and is able to systematize, standardize, and make adjustments as needed. Conducting secure software development activities requires the ability to analyze security issues and propose improvement measures to ensure a secure software development process. Cheng Tongyi.

d) Level 4. 1) Assessment of basic practices. Basic practice activities at level four and below that are not implemented are deemed non-compliant; those implemented but not perfect are considered non-compliant. The judgment is basically compliant; the judgment is compliant if the implementation is complete and traceable. 2) Evaluation Process Area. The process area corresponds to the basic practices at level four and below, and sets compliance rate thresholds for each level of practice activity. The compliance rate threshold should not be lower than 50%. If the compliance rate is less than the threshold, the process area is judged as non-compliant; if the compliance rate is greater than the threshold, the process area is judged as non-compliant. If the threshold (or equal to) is met and there are no non-compliant items, then the process domain is considered compliant; otherwise, it is considered basically compliant. 3) Evaluation Process. If any one of the process areas contained in the process is non-compliant, then the entire process area is non-compliant. If it meets the requirements, the process determines it to be compliant; otherwise, it is considered basically compliant. 4) Result Judgment. No non-conformities were found in the eight safety processes, indicating that the organization possesses Level 4 capability and can promote modular safety practices. A comprehensive asset library, automated testing toolchain, and customized security access rules enable quantitative control of security technology activities, providing... The ability to efficiently achieve organizational security goals.

e) Level 5. 1) Assessment of basic practices. Basic practice activities at level 5 and below that are not implemented are deemed non-compliant; those implemented but not adequately implemented are considered non-compliant. The judgment is basically compliant; the judgment is compliant if the implementation is complete and traceable. 2) Evaluation Process Area. The process area corresponds to the basic practices at level five and below, and sets compliance rate thresholds for each level of practice activity. The compliance rate threshold should not be lower than 50%. If the compliance rate is less than the threshold, the process area is judged as non-compliant; if the compliance rate is greater than the threshold, the process area is judged as non-compliant. If the threshold is (or equal to) met and there are no non-compliant items, the process domain is considered compliant; otherwise, it is considered basically compliant. 3) Evaluation Process. If any process area contained in the process is non-compliant, then the process is non-compliant, and all process areas are non-compliant. If it meets the requirements, the process determines it to be compliant; otherwise, it is considered basically compliant. 4) Result Assessment. No non-conformities were found in the eight safety processes, indicating that the organization possesses Level 5 capability and can proactively adapt to complex situations. By integrating software security development activities and processes, predictive analytics can be used to adjust organizational-level security objectives and risk management.

......
This preview omits tables, figures, formulas and parts of the technical clauses. The complete document — 57 pages — is available in the English PDF.

How to Buy GB/T 47470-2026

  1. 1Add to cart. Click the "Buy GB/T 47470-2026" button on this page. You can add more standards before checkout.
  2. 2Checkout. Enter your email and billing details. Payment is processed securely by Stripe (cards, Apple Pay, Google Pay supported).
  3. 3Instant delivery (0–9 sec). Delivery is automatic: within seconds of payment you'll receive an email with a secure download link. The link stays valid for 72 hours.
  4. 4Invoice included. A tax invoice is attached to the confirmation email. Need a custom invoice? Contact us.

Related Standards

English PDF
57 pages
Instant delivery (0–9 sec)
Invoice included
View Cart

Secure payment via Stripe

Payments accepted

VisaMastercardAmerican ExpressApple PayGoogle PayStripe

GB/T 47470-2026

$560.00

$475.00for partners