GB/T 47442.1-2026Methods for potential evaluation of CO2 geological utilization and storage in oil and gas areas — Part 1: Geological utilization (English PDF)
油气区二氧化碳地质利用与封存潜力评价方法 第1部分:地质利用
This is a limited preview
Buy now to download the full PDF (17 pages)
Need quotation for your management?
Get a formal quotation for GB/T 47442.1-2026 in 30 minutes.
Issued by
SAMR; SAC
Level / Type
National · Recommended
Issue date
April 30, 2026
Implementation date
August 1, 2026
Scope
GB/T 47442.1-2026 is the English-translated version of 油气区二氧化碳地质利用与封存潜力评价方法 第1部分:地质利用.
GB/T 47442.1-2026 is the first part of the Chinese method for estimating how much carbon dioxide an oil or gas area can take, and covers the geological utilization case, where the CO2 is injected to drive more oil or gas out.
It sets out the data to collect - policy and regulatory documents, carbon source data, reservoir geology, laboratory experiments, production and monitoring data and engineering data - the screening principles and key parameter ranges for oil and gas reservoirs, the indicators and methods for predicting potential, including enhanced recovery, newly added recoverable reserves and the sequestration total split into structural, dissolution and binding sequestration, and an uncertainty analysis for abnormally high-pressure and edge-bottom water reservoirs.
It applies to developing oil and gas reservoirs. Issued on 30 April 2026, it has applied since 1 August 2026.
Found what you need?
Document preview — GB/T 47442.1-2026
National Standard of the People's Republic of China
- ICS
- 75.020
- Classification
- E 12
Issued by: State Administration for Market Regulation; Standardization Administration of the PRC
Contents
- 1 Scope
- 4 Data Collection Content
- 5 Oil and gas reservoir screening
- 6 Indicators and methods for predicting geological utilization potential
- 7 Uncertainty Analysis
1 Scope
4 Data Collection Content
This document outlines the data collection requirements for evaluating the geological utilization and storage potential of carbon dioxide in oil and gas reservoirs, and specifies the key points for reservoir screening.
The paper describes the indicators and methods for predicting geological utilization potential and provides information on uncertainty analysis.
This document applies to the technical adaptability analysis and potential evaluation of carbon dioxide geological utilization in developing oil and gas reservoirs.
4.1 Policy and regulatory documents
This includes national and local government action plans, regional development plans, financial support, and tax incentives for oil and gas reservoirs and surrounding carbon source areas. Legal documents.
4.2 Carbon Source Data
This includes the sources and distribution of carbon dioxide in industries such as coal chemical, refining, and power generation, carbon emissions, new capacity planning, and regional carbon market data. According to data such as regional carbon price gradients.
4.3 Geological data of oil and gas reservoirs
This includes regional data on the natural environment of the oil and gas reservoir to be evaluated, such as its geographical location, topography, hydrogeology, and other natural environmental factors, as well as the characteristics of the caprock and surrounding rocks, and the oil and gas reservoir itself.
Regional geological features, including structural and fracture characteristics, reservoir characteristics, fluid distribution and properties, reservoir pressure and temperature systems, and gas cap and edge water conditions.
For the compilation of basic data such as geological reserves and calibrated recovery rate, please refer to Appendix A.
4.4 Indoor Experimental Data
This includes core analysis experiments, rock mechanics experiments, high-pressure formation fluid property experiments, core displacement experiments, and minimum miscibility pressure experiments. Relevant data and information.
4.5 Production Data and Monitoring Information
This includes dynamic production data such as water injection volume, oil production, water production, formation pressure, water cut, gas-oil ratio, and recovery rate, as well as water absorption profiles and production data. Monitoring data such as liquid profile.
4.6 Engineering Data
This includes data related to wellbore and surface engineering, such as cementing and completion quality and casing material.
5 Oil and gas reservoir screening
5.1 Screening Principles
Taking into account factors such as carbon dioxide injection capacity, geological body stability and sealing, and reservoir characteristics, the specific principles are as follows.
a) It does not conflict with the local natural environment, development plans, policies, and regulations;
b) The oil and gas reservoir has suitable burial depth, temperature and pressure conditions, reservoir permeability, pore connectivity, and fluid characteristics, allowing carbon dioxide to be effectively utilized. injection;
c) The oil and gas reservoir has a complete and stable geological structure, is far from active zones such as earthquake and volcanic areas, and the faults have closed boundaries and good lateral shielding.
The system's potential activity has a relatively small impact on the reservoir and caprock;
d) The caprock is continuously distributed and well-sealed, with no tensile penetrating faults, and the overlying layer has strong sealing ability. The direct caprock rocks are resistant to carbon dioxide.
Carbon dioxide is chemically inert and can exist stably for a long time.
5.2 Reservoir Screening
c) Considering available carbon sources, utilization rate of old wells in the oilfield, oil price, carbon price, total cost per barrel of oil, investment, taxes, depreciation, etc., analyze reservoir II. The economic feasibility of carbon dioxide flooding technology.
5.2.1 Determination of Minimum Miscibility Pressure
The minimum miscibility pressure of carbon dioxide with formation crude oil is determined using methods such as indoor experiments, theoretical derivation, reservoir analogy, or empirical formulas.
Force reference value. Select the range of screening parameters based on the miscibility pressure reference value.
5.2.2 Screening Requirements
Refer to Table A.1 to compile the collected basic reservoir parameters. For reservoirs that meet the screening criteria, further refinement is performed based on the key parameter ranges in Table 1.
This study analyzes the adaptability of carbon dioxide miscible flooding or immiscible flooding technologies in oil reservoirs. Suitable reservoirs for carbon dioxide miscible flooding or immiscible flooding should... It conforms to the requirements in Table 1.
5.2.3 Implementation Objectives
For the selected reservoirs, the carbon source situation, wellbore integrity, and economic feasibility are evaluated under current social, economic, and technological conditions, thereby... The following are recommendations for the current key implementation objectives.
a) Evaluate the wellbore integrity of the target reservoir, including the integrity of the wellhead equipment, the integrity of the wellbore structure, and the evaluation of wellbore corrosion, and analyze the second... Carbon dioxide leakage risk;
b) Using the selected target reservoir as the center, evaluate the surrounding carbon sources, comprehensively considering the carbon source scale, carbon source quality, source-sink distance, etc.
Considering the economics of capture and transportation, list suitable available carbon sources;
5.3 Gas reservoir screening
5.3.1 Screening Requirements
Refer to Table A.2 to compile the collected basic parameters of gas reservoirs. For gas reservoirs that meet the screening criteria, further refinement is performed based on the key parameter ranges in Table 2.
This study analyzes the adaptability of carbon dioxide flooding technology in gas reservoirs. Relatively mature carbon dioxide flooding technologies are used in water-gas reservoirs and condensate gas reservoirs.
For conventional gas reservoirs, those suitable for carbon dioxide flooding should meet the requirements of Table 2.
5.3.2 Implementation Objectives
For the selected gas reservoirs, evaluate their carbon source situation, wellbore integrity, and economic feasibility under current social, economic, and technological conditions, and provide... The following are recommendations for the current key implementation objectives.
a) Evaluate the wellbore integrity of the target gas reservoir, including the integrity of the wellhead equipment, the integrity of the wellbore structure, and the evaluation of wellbore corrosion, and analyze the second... Carbon dioxide leakage risk;
b) Using the selected target gas reservoir as the center, evaluate the surrounding carbon sources, comprehensively considering the carbon source scale, carbon source quality, source-sink distance, Considering the economics of capture and transportation, list suitable available carbon sources;
c) Considering available carbon sources, utilization rate of old wells in the oilfield, oil price, carbon price, total cost per barrel of oil, investment, taxes, depreciation, etc., analyze the gas reservoir II. The economic feasibility of carbon dioxide flooding technology.
6 Indicators and methods for predicting geological utilization potential
6.1 Potential Forecasting Indicators
6.1.1 Oil Reservoir
6.1.1.1 Potential prediction indicators include the extent of enhanced oil recovery from carbon dioxide flooding to the end of its entire development lifecycle, and the increase in recoverable reserves. Quantity, effective amount of carbon dioxide to be stored.
6.1.1.2 Reservoirs that meet the requirements of Table 1 are suitable for carbon dioxide flooding, and their reserves are considered suitable reserves, and are classified as suitable carbon dioxide miscible phases.
There are two types of reservoirs. those suitable for carbon dioxide immiscible flooding and those suitable for carbon dioxide immiscible flooding.
Note: Oil reservoirs that are not suitable for production or storage under current technological conditions will not be subject to oil production or storage potential prediction.
6.1.2 Gas reservoir
6.1.2.1 Potential prediction indicators include the extent of enhanced oil recovery from utilizing carbon dioxide-driven gas extraction until the end of its entire lifecycle development, and the newly added recoverable reserves. Quantity, effective amount of carbon dioxide to be stored.
6.1.2.2 Gas reservoirs that meet the requirements of Table 2 are suitable for carbon dioxide flooding, and their reserves are suitable reserves.
Note: Gas reservoirs that are not suitable for gas production or storage under current technological conditions will not be subject to gas enhancement or storage potential prediction.
6.2 Methods for Predicting Potential for Increased Oil and Gas Production
6.2.1 Increase the recovery rate
The methods employed include physical simulation experiments, reservoir numerical simulations, analogies, and empirical formulas to determine the effectiveness of carbon dioxide-assisted oil or gas displacement. Reference values for the range of recovery rate.
6.2.2 New recoverable reserves from oil displacement
Suitable reserves for carbon dioxide flooding can be obtained through data collection or calculated using the volumetric method according to the provisions of DZ/T 0217.
Then, numerical simulation and other methods are used to calculate the new recoverable reserves after carbon dioxide flooding, or the recovery rate is increased according to formula (1).
6.2.3 New recoverable reserves from gas displacement
The appropriate reserves for carbon dioxide-driven gasification can be obtained through data collection or calculated using the volumetric method according to the provisions of DZ/T 0217.
Then, numerical simulation and other methods are used to calculate the new recoverable reserves after carbon dioxide displacement, or the recovery rate is increased according to formula (2).
6.3 Methods for Predicting Sequestration Potential
6.3.1 Reservoir Storage Potential
6.3.1.1 Total Seized Stock
In reservoirs developed using carbon dioxide flooding, considering the time scale, the calculation of carbon dioxide sequestration potential neglects the mineralization and sequestration mechanism, and the total... The amount of sequestration is the sum of the amount of construction sequestration, the amount of dissolution sequestration, and the amount of binding sequestration, calculated according to formula (3).
6.3.1.2 Construction of Seized Storage Quantity
Injecting carbon dioxide to restore reservoir pressure to its original formation pressure, and then using an equal amount of carbon dioxide to fill the underground space vacated by formation fluid extraction. […]
6.3.1.3 Dissolved and Sequestered Amount in Aqueous Phase
The amount of carbon dioxide dissolved and stored in the formation water phase is calculated according to formula (5).
6.3.1.4 Dissolved and Sequestered Amount in Crude Oil
The amount of dissolved carbon dioxide sequestrated in crude oil reservoirs is calculated according to formula (6).
6.3.2 Gas reservoir storage potential
6.3.2.1 Total amount of sealed inventory
In gas reservoirs developed using carbon dioxide flooding, considering the time scale, the calculation of carbon dioxide sequestration potential neglects the mineralization and sequestration mechanism, and the total... The amount of sequestration is the sum of the amount of sequestration constructed, the amount of sequestration dissolved, and the amount of sequestration bound.
6.3.2.2 Construction of Seized Storage Quantity
Injecting carbon dioxide to restore reservoir pressure to its original formation pressure, based on the underground space freed up by the produced fluids during gas drive, is equivalent to... Based on the ideal assumption of carbon dioxide occupation, for dry gas reservoirs, according to the material balance theory, the amount of carbon dioxide occupied by the structure is determined by formula (8). calculate.
6.3.2.3 Dissolution and Seal Amount
The dissolved and sequestered amount of carbon dioxide in the aqueous phase of a water-bearing gas reservoir is calculated using formula (5). The dissolved carbon dioxide in crude oil of a condensate gas reservoir... The amount of sealed stock is calculated using formula (6).
6.3.2.4 Binding and Sequestration Amount
The amount of carbon dioxide trapped and stored in the gas reservoir is calculated using formula (7).
6.3.3 Key Parameter Value Determination Method
It is advisable to utilize physical simulation experiments and numerical simulations of oil and gas reservoirs to obtain the relevant parameter values in the formula for the amount of oil reserves. Alternatively, methods with similar oil reserves can be used.
By analogy with known parameter values of typical blocks with specific conditions, key parameters can also be determined using empirical formulas and relational diagrams. Values are shown in Appendix B.
7 Uncertainty Analysis
Due to the unique geological characteristics of some oil and gas reservoirs and technological advancements, the following uncertainties exist in the evaluation of carbon dioxide geological utilization potential. analyze.
For abnormally high-pressure oil and gas reservoirs, it is advisable to revise the assumptions of potential prediction, and the upper limit of the reservoir pressure for carbon dioxide injection should be adjusted from the original formation pressure.
The pressure was changed to hydrostatic pressure at the same depth, and the formula for calculating the storage potential was corrected using the formation's comprehensive compressibility coefficient.
---For edge-bottom water reservoirs, it is advisable to correct the water intrusion rate in formulas (4) and (5) for the injected water rate and the produced water rate after carbon dioxide flooding. Changes in water volume (Viw-Vpw).
---For edge-bottom water-gas reservoirs, it is advisable to modify formula (8) by using the water changes affected by injected carbon dioxide.
---For gas reservoirs that contain carbon dioxide, it is advisable to modify the carbon dioxide content FIG in the produced gas in formula (8).
---Under current technological and policy conditions, the primary focus should be on oil displacement while also considering oil storage; reservoirs with high potential for oil recovery are preferable. With social development and technological advancements... Progress has made it possible that reservoirs that can balance oil production potential and storage potential will become a better choice.
......
This preview omits tables, figures, formulas and parts of the technical clauses. The complete document — 17 pages — is available in the English PDF.
How to Download GB/T 47442.1-2026
- 1
Add to cart
Click "Download PDF" on this page and choose "Buy this standard". You can add more standards before checkout.
- 2
Checkout
Enter your email and billing details. Payment is processed securely by Stripe (cards or bank transfer). Prefer bank details? Request a quotation (min. order $300).
- 3
Instant delivery (0–9 sec)
Delivery is automatic: within seconds of payment you'll receive an email with a secure download link. The link stays valid for 72 hours.
- 4
Invoice included
A tax invoice is attached to the confirmation email. Need a custom invoice? Contact us.
Related Standards
GB/T 10003-2026 — Biaxially oriented polypropylene (BOPP) film
GB/T 10004-2026 — Plastic/Plastic laminated films and pouches for packaging
GB/T 10007-2026 — Rigid cellular plastics - Determination of shear properties
Secure payment via Stripe
Payments accepted
GB/T 47442.1-2026
$300.00