GB/T 46667-2025Guidelines for effectiveness evaluation of primary veterinary institutions (English PDF)

Foreword

This document complies with the provisions of GB/T 1.1-2020 "Standardization Work Guidelines Part

1.Structure and Drafting Rules of Standardization Documents". Drafting. Please note that some content in this document may involve patents. The issuing organization of this document assumes no responsibility for identifying patents. This document was proposed by the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs of the People's Republic of China. This document is under the jurisdiction of the National Technical Committee on Animal Health Standardization (SAC/TC181). This document was drafted by: China Animal Health and Epidemiology Center, Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region Animal Health Supervision Institute, and Yunnan Provincial Animal Health Center. Animal disease supervision institute, Shaanxi Provincial Animal Health and Slaughter Management Station, and Heilongjiang Provincial Animal Disease Prevention and Control Center. The main drafters of this document are. Lu Ping, Li Jiarui, Guo Jianmei, Luo Rui, Yin Hongbin, Dai Dehua, Zhang Yongguo, and Cai Lijuan. Guidelines for Performance Evaluation of Primary Veterinary Institutions

1 Scope

GB/T 46667-2025 is the Chinese national standard covering assessing a township veterinary station - the staff and their qualifications, the equipment and the cold chain for vaccines, the disease reporting and its timeliness, the vaccination coverage achieved, and the scoring that identifies where the system is thin. The primary veterinary network is the first place an animal disease outbreak is seen. First edition, under the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs. In force from 1 May 2026. Issued on 31 October 2025, it has been in force since 1 May 2026.

This document provides guidance on the principles, scope, indicators, grading, procedures, and application of results for the performance evaluation of primary veterinary institutions. This document applies to performance evaluation activities conducted at primary veterinary institutions.

2 Normative references

This document has no normative references.

3 Terms and Definitions

The following terms and definitions apply to this document.

3.1 Departments or units under the county-level government that are responsible for animal disease prevention and control.

Note. This includes veterinary authorities, animal health supervision agencies, animal disease prevention and control agencies, and township (street) agencies responsible for animal disease prevention and control.

3.2 The evaluation agency, in accordance with relevant evaluation standards, comprehensively assesses a region's veterinary management system, the operational efficiency of its veterinary system, and its quality level. evaluate.

4 Evaluation Principles

4.1 Scientific nature Respecting the development characteristics of grassroots veterinary institutions, the assessment should be organized and implemented scientifically and rationally. The selection of assessment methods and indicator systems should strive for scientific rigor. Learn rationally.

4.2 Effectiveness Based on the management needs and assessment objectives of grassroots veterinary institutions, assessment content was designed and compared with the assessment indicator system in a targeted manner, ensuring objectivity and thoroughness. To accurately and comprehensively reflect the status and performance of grassroots veterinary institutions and give full play to the guiding role of evaluation.

4.3 Systemic Adhering to a systematic and comprehensive perspective in the assessment, we accurately grasp the inherent logic of the functions, resources, activities, and impacts of grassroots veterinary institutions. The system treats grassroots veterinary institutions as a whole and conducts a systematic evaluation of them.