GB/T 43560-2023New-type urbanization—Guidelines for evaluation of innovative city (English PDF)

Foreword

This document complies with the provisions of GB/T 1:1-2020 "Standardization Work Guidelines Part 1: Structure and Drafting Rules of Standardization Documents" Drafting:

Please note that some content in this document may involve patents: The publisher of this document assumes no responsibility for identifying patents:

This document is proposed and managed by the China Institute of Standardization:

This document was drafted by: China Institute of Scientific and Technological Information, China Institute of Standardization, Dalian Ocean University, Taizhou Institute of Standardization, Jinan University, Southeast University, Qingdao Institute of Science and Technology Information, Beijing Liyan Innovation and Technology Consulting Center, Jinan Science and Technology Bureau:

The main drafters of this document: Zhang Zhijuan, Yun Zhenyu, Yang Chaofeng, Hu Liangbing, Ma Xiaolei, Han Yanbo, Wu Wei, Cheng Ruyan, Zhang Yiyan, Yan Mei, Tan Qiqi, Rong Fei, Wang Yujun, He Ping, Chen Lansheng, Chen Xiwu, Peng Wenbo, Zhang Yao:

New Urbanization Innovative City Evaluation Guide

1 Scope

This document provides the basic principles, evaluation content, evaluation index system, evaluation procedures and application of evaluation results for innovative cities: guide:

This document is applicable to the evaluation of innovation levels in cities at the prefecture level and above:

2 Normative reference documents

This document has no normative references:

3 Terms and definitions

The following terms and definitions apply to this document: 3:1 innovative city innovative city With a good innovation environment, abundant innovation resources, and active innovation activities, scientific and technological innovation has become the core driving force for high-quality economic and social development:

A city that plays a leading and exemplary role in the process of high-level scientific and technological self-reliance and Chinese-style modernization:

4 Abbreviations

The following abbreviations apply to this document:

5 Basic principles

5:1 Adhere to the objective evaluation principles of seeking truth from facts, openness, fairness, and systematic comprehensiveness:

5:2 Adhere to the advanced evaluation principles of leading development and overall consideration:

5:3 Adhere to the principle of building an evaluation index system that combines positive indicators with negative indicators and complements core indicators with auxiliary indicators:

6 Evaluation content

The evaluation of innovative cities should include the following five dimensions:

— Innovative governance reflects the ecological environment of urban innovation and entrepreneurship, guides the city to transform its science and technology management functions, deepens the reform of the science and technology system, and forms Establish a basic system to support comprehensive innovation and accelerate the gathering of funds, talents and other scientific and technological innovation resources:

— Original innovation power reflects the city's ability to produce major original scientific and technological achievements, guides the city to strengthen its strategic scientific and technological strength, and strengthens its original Innovative and leading scientific and technological research, seizing the commanding heights of science and technology: