GB/T 38272-2019Safety of machinery - Guidelines for the safety upgrading of machinery (English PDF)
机械安全 机械设备安全升级指南
Open the GB/T 38272-2019 preview as PDF
This is a limited preview
Buy now to download the full PDF (30 pages)
Issued by
SAMR; SAC
Level / Type
National · Recommended
Issue date
December 10, 2019
Implementation date
July 1, 2020
Scope
GB/T 38272-2019 is the English-translated version of 机械安全 机械设备安全升级指南.
China's national guidelines for upgrading the safety of existing machinery. It addresses the question that every machinery safety regime eventually faces: what to do about the machines already installed. Safety standards apply to new equipment, and a factory's machines may be twenty or thirty years old, built to rules that no longer represent good practice, and still capable of decades of useful service. Replacing them is rarely justifiable and often not possible. Upgrading them is, and doing it well requires a method rather than a shopping list of guards. The guidelines set out the sequence: assess the machine as it is against current requirements, identify the hazards that remain, decide which can be removed by design change and which need guarding or protective devices, and verify that what was fitted actually works and has not introduced a new hazard - which is a real risk when an interlock is added to a machine whose control system was never designed for one.
Document preview — GB/T 38272-2019
National Standard of the People's Republic of China
- ICS
- 13.110
- Classification
- J 09
Issued by: State Administration for Market Regulation; Standardization Administration of the PRC
Contents
- 1 Scope
- 2 Normative references
- 3 Terms and Definitions
- 4 Security upgrade process
- 5 Risk Assessment
- 6 Security upgrade plan
- 7 Safety upgrade design
- 7.2 Design method
- 7.2.3 Safety protection and supplementary protection
- 8 Security Upgrade Implementation
- 9 Security upgrade confirmation
1 Scope
China's national guidelines for upgrading the safety of existing machinery. It addresses the question that every machinery safety regime eventually faces: what to do about the machines already installed. Safety standards apply to new equipment, and a factory's machines may be twenty or thirty years old, built to rules that no longer represent good practice, and still capable of decades of useful service. Replacing them is rarely justifiable and often not possible. Upgrading them is, and doing it well requires a method rather than a shopping list of guards. The guidelines set out the sequence: assess the machine as it is against current requirements, identify the hazards that remain, decide which can be removed by design change and which need guarding or protective devices, and verify that what was fitted actually works and has not introduced a new hazard - which is a real risk when an interlock is added to a machine whose control system was never designed for one.
This standard provides the terms and definitions for the safe upgrade of mechanical equipment, and provides guidelines for the safe upgrade of mechanical equipment. This standard applies to the safety upgrade of in-service machinery and equipment. This standard does not apply to mechanical equipment that has been specifically stipulated by national laws and regulations, such as special equipment.
2 Normative references
The following documents are essential for the application of this document. For dated references, only the dated version applies to this article pieces. For undated references, the latest edition (including all amendments) applies to this document.
GB/T 15706-2012 General Principles of Mechanical Safety Design Risk Assessment and Risk Reduction
GB/T 16855.1-2018 Safety-related parts of machinery safety control systems - Part
3 Terms and Definitions
The terms and definitions defined in GB/T 15706-2012 and the following terms and definitions apply to this document.
3.1 machinery equipment A combination consisting of several parts and components connected with a specific application purpose, at least one of which is movable, and Equipped or scheduled to be equipped with a powertrain.
Note. The "mechanical equipment" defined by this term is equivalent to the "machine" defined by the term
3.1 in GB/T 15706-2012.
3.2 safetyupgradingsafetyupgrading Based on the results of risk assessment, activities to reduce the risk of mechanical equipment through technical means.
3.3 acceptable risk tolerablerisk The level of risk that is acceptable under given conditions, based on current societal values. [GB/T 35080-2018, Definition 3.2]
4 Security upgrade process
The security upgrade process (see Figure 1) consists of the following 5 steps.
a) risk assessment;
b) Security upgrade plan;
c) Safety upgrade design;
d) Security upgrade implementation;
e) Security upgrade confirmation.
5 Risk Assessment
Security upgrades should be based on the results of the risk assessment. Since the Class C standard identifies significant hazards commonly associated with a class of machinery and equipment, and gives the safe handling of these hazards requirements and/or risk mitigation measures. Therefore, if the mechanical equipment or similar mechanical equipment has the corresponding C standard (machine product safety standard Standard), it is advisable to directly target the major hazards identified by the corresponding C standard, and formulate a safety upgrade plan according to the requirements of the C standard (see 6.2), And carry out safety upgrade design (see 7.2). For other hazard sources not covered by the C standard, it should be based on GB/T 15706-2012 Chapter 5 conducts risk assessment. For mechanical equipment that does not correspond to Class C standards, risk assessment should be carried out in accordance with Chapter 5 of GB/T 15706-2012. After the risk assessment is completed, the identified hazard sources that need to be reduced should be recorded in Table 1, and compiled to meet the requirements of GB/T 15706- Risk assessment report for the relevant requirements of Chapter 7 in.2012.
6 Security upgrade plan
6.1 Overview Appropriate risk reduction measures should be selected based on the results of the risk assessment and technical feasibility, and a safety upgrade plan should be formulated to enable the mechanical equipment. to an acceptable level of risk. When choosing risk reduction measures, it is advisable to seek the opinions of personnel engaged in mechanical equipment operation, debugging, maintenance, repair, etc. The impact of normal use of mechanical equipment is minimized. According to the hazard sources listed in Table 1, the corresponding risk reduction measures should be determined respectively (see 6.2~6.4) to form a safety upgrade plan. if Risk reduction measures need to rely on safety-related control systems to achieve corresponding safety functions, and also need to be based on GB/T 16855.1-2018 Appendix A in the determination of the required performance level (PLr) for safety-related control systems.
6.2 Adopt the risk reduction measures specified in the C standard Adoption of the risk reduction measures specified in the C standard can be regarded as an acceptable level of risk through sufficient risk reduction. in the exact When deciding on risk reduction measures, the C standard should be given priority. If the Class C standard provides several optional risk reduction measures, but does not specify the selection principle, it should be based on the specific risk assessment results. Choose appropriate risk reduction measures.
6.3 Applying the Risk Reduction Process Iterative Three-Step Method to Select Risk Reduction Measures There are no Class C standards for machinery or similar mechanical equipment, and hazards not covered by Class C standards, if it is necessary to take a risk If the risk reduction measures are not taken, then when formulating the security upgrade plan, the three steps of the risk reduction process given in Figure 1 in GB/T 15706-2012 should be iterated. method to select appropriate risk reduction measures. Table 2 from hazard elimination, risk factors (severity of injury, personnel exposure to hazard, hazardous event The three-step method of selecting risk reduction measures according to the iterative three-step method of the risk reduction process is given. guide.
6.4 Consideration of safety-related control systems If the safety protection devices (such as interlocks, emergency stop devices, etc.) used in the risk reduction measures need to rely on the control system to achieve their safety If it is fully functional, the safety-related control system should be designed according to GB/T 16855.1-2018 when making a safety upgrade plan.
7 Safety upgrade design
7.1 Principles The ultimate goal of security upgrades is to minimize risk. The safety upgrade design should be based on the hazards identified in the safety upgrade plan and the corresponding solutions, in accordance with the provisions of the corresponding Class C standards And/or the design principles determined in GB/T 15706-2012, and complete the design item by item in combination with relevant standards. If there is a Class C standard, the safety upgrade design should be carried out in accordance with the safety requirements and/or risk reduction measures specified in the Class C standard. When the requirements of Class C standards are different from those of Class A standards or Class B standards, the requirements of Class C standards are given priority. If there is no Class C standard or the Class C standard does not provide clear risk reduction measures, the safety upgrade design should be carried out in accordance with 7.2.
7.2 Design method
7.2.1 Overview Figure 1 in GB/T 15706-2012 presents an iterative three-step approach to the risk reduction process. In order to take full advantage of the available technology to To reduce the risk, this process should be carried out several times in a row if necessary. The following four factors should be considered when undertaking the risk reduction process.
a) safety at all stages of the life cycle of machinery;
b) the ability of the mechanical equipment to perform its function;
c) ease of use of mechanical equipment;
d) After the safety upgrade, the cost of mechanical equipment operation and subsequent disassembly. Appendix A gives the commonly used Type B standards in the design of security upgrades.
7.2.2 Intrinsically safe design The intrinsically safe design should meet the requirements of
6.2 in GB/T 15706-2012 and the requirements of the relevant Class B and/or Class C standards. If it involves major changes to the structure of the mechanical equipment, the original design data of the mechanical equipment should be obtained.
7.2.3 Safety protection and supplementary protection
7.2.3.1 Safety guards The design or selection of safety guards should meet the requirements of relevant Class B standards, such as the guards that meet GB/T 8196, Interlocking device of GB/T 18831. The design or selection of safety guards should be suitable for the intended use, taking into account the associated mechanical and other hazards. safety gear It should be coordinated with the working environment of the machinery and equipment, and should be designed so that it cannot be easily discarded. In order to reduce the possibility of it being discarded, it should be safe to Interference of guards with various movements during operation of machinery and at other stages of the machine's life cycle is minimized. Safety guards should.
a) The structure is sturdy and durable;
b) does not add any additional risk;
c) not easily bypassed or rendered inoperable;
d) There is a sufficient distance from the danger zone (see GB/T 23821 and GB/T 19876);
e) minimal visual barriers to observing the production process;
f) Only allow access to the area that has to be operated, and perform necessary work such as tool installation and/or replacement and maintenance, and as far as possible Safety guards can be removed or rendered inoperative. See 6.3.1~
6.3.4 in GB/T 15706-2012 for general requirements of safety guards.
7.2.3.2 Supplementary protective measures Depending on the intended use and reasonably foreseeable misuse of the machinery, safety upgrades may have to incorporate measures that are neither intrinsically safe, safety Full protection, nor is it a supplementary protection measure for use of information. The following are some examples of supplementary protection measures.
--- Emergency stop device;
---Escape and rescue measures for trapped persons;
--- measures of isolation and energy dissipation;
--- Device for convenient and safe handling of heavy parts of machinery and equipment;
--- Measures for safe access to machinery and equipment. See
8 Security Upgrade Implementation
8.1 Overview The implementation of safety upgrade should be based on the results of safety upgrade design, and the implementation of safety upgrade of mechanical equipment should be completed on site. During implementation, except In order to carry out construction strictly in accordance with the safety upgrade design, measures should also be taken to ensure the safety of construction personnel and related personnel.
8.2 Qualifications On-site construction personnel should understand the safety requirements of the construction site, and if necessary, the construction unit and/or personnel should also have corresponding qualifications.
8.3 On-site construction During the construction project, the relevant safety production requirements shall be observed. At the same time, it is also suitable for operators, maintenance personnel, management personnel related to mechanical equipment. Suppliers of personnel and/or machinery are fully communicated and coordinated to ensure that safety upgrades are implemented smoothly.
9 Security upgrade confirmation
9.1 Confirmation of safety precautions It is advisable to confirm whether the safety protection measures adopted for the safety upgrade are in place through visual inspection and other methods.
9.2 Confirmation of safety functions Measures should be taken to verify that the security safeguards adopted for security upgrades can achieve the intended security functions.
9.3 Validation of safety-related control systems The components and safety circuits of safety-related control systems should be confirmed according to GB/T 16855.2.
9.4 Confirmation of residual risk It should be confirmed by visual inspection and other methods whether texts, words, signs, signals, symbols are provided for the remaining risks after the safety upgrade. or usage information such as charts.
9.5 Identification of new risks Check whether the risk reduction measures taken by the security upgrade create new risks. If so, the security upgrade process in Chapter 4 should be followed Deal with new risks.
9.6 Archive Documentation related to security upgrades should be archived, including at least.
a) Security upgrade plan;
b) safety design drawings;
c) safety loop procedure;
d) safety product manual;
e) Calculation book for determining PL;
f) Safety upgrade confirmation acceptance list;
g) Usage Information.
......
This preview omits tables, figures, formulas and parts of the technical clauses. The complete document — 30 pages — is available in the English PDF.
Referenced standards
Normative references
GB/T 15706-2012 · GB/T 16855.1-2018 · GB/T 16855.2
How to Buy GB/T 38272-2019
- 1Add to cart. Click the "Buy GB/T 38272-2019" button on this page. You can add more standards before checkout.
- 2Checkout. Enter your email and billing details. Payment is processed securely by Stripe (cards, Apple Pay, Google Pay supported).
- 3Instant delivery (0–9 sec). Delivery is automatic: within seconds of payment you'll receive an email with a secure download link. The link stays valid for 72 hours.
- 4Invoice included. A tax invoice is attached to the confirmation email. Need a custom invoice? Contact us.
Related Standards
GB/T 47310-2026 — Determination of total silicon, aluminium, iron, potassium, sodium, calcium, magnesium, manganese, phosphorus, titanium and sulfur in soil - Monochromatic excitation energy dispersive X-ray fluorescence spectrometry
GB/T 47321-2026 — Specification for the warning data exchange of the national emergency early warning dissemination system
GB/T 47293-2026 — Determination of available mercury in soil
Secure payment via Stripe
Payments accepted
GB/T 38272-2019
$260.00